Let's be clear: nothing happened to the plaintiff in 303 Creative, the whole "case" was a hypothetical exercise, and the GOP Justices used it as a vehicle to undermine every single federal, state, county, and city anti-discrimination law in the country.

There's now a special exemption for any bigot who wants to claim their work is "expressive," even if the work they do doesn't express any message at all.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/22pdf/21-476_c185.pdf

@maxkennerly so why is shit like that even legal?

Like literally??

One can't just waste the legal systems' resources woth some hypothetical shit like that...

Or can they?