Red Hat is happy to take your code and distribute it, first with minimal changes, and perhaps with more changes over time.

But if you do it, you are a leech.

Love that the Brodie here goes into gatekeeping what is considered a contribution:

https://www.redhat.com/en/blog/red-hats-commitment-open-source-response-gitcentosorg-changes

Red Hat’s commitment to open source: A response to the git.centos.org changes

More about Red Hat's decision to make CentOS Stream the primary repository for RHEL sources.

This is Red Hat’s Reddit moment: how dare people other than us benefit from the free labor that we have packaged.

If you had the misfortune of reading the replies to my post, enjoy an explanation without corporate speak.

While the authors of this post need to walk a fine line to attempt to salvage their efforts, I have no stakes on this, and can tell you in black and white the answer to the last question is: yes, IBM and Red Hat are doing this to eliminate their competitors and extract more money from the market.

Time to pay rent:

https://almalinux.org/blog/impact-of-rhel-changes/

AlmaLinux OS
@Migueldeicaza Bit lost in the lingo here, but does this mean Red Hat is trying to benefit from all commits made to RHEL-based distro’s while gating all its own contributions behind a subscription paywall?
@maxsteenbergen essentially- yes