1. According to @[email protected], textbook publishers are trying to indoctrinate students by incorporating "woke" concepts into social studies textbooks

But DeSantis has provided few details

So we've obtained Florida's reviews of the textbooks

Follow along if interested

🧵

@[email protected] 2. Many reviews are performed by right-wing activists from the Florida Citizens Alliance

"Florida children are being indoctrinated in a public school system that undermines their individual rights and destroys our nation’s founding principles and family values," the group says.

@[email protected] 3. One reviewer of a 1st Grade text, Social Studies Alive!, determined that the textbook was in "very poor/no alignment" with the Florida law that prohibits instruction of gender identity.

Why?

The textbook's "photographs and graphics include homosexual...couples."

@[email protected] 4. Another initially rejected textbook for 6th-8th grade was Civics Alive! One reviewer who did not recommend the text claims that "the discussion of lesbianism… [is] inappropriate for the middle school classroom."

https://popular.info/p/what-makes-a-social-studies-textbook

What makes a social studies textbook "woke" in Ron DeSantis' Florida

According to Florida Governor Ron DeSantis (R), textbook publishers are attempting to indoctrinate Florida students by incorporating "woke" concepts into social studies textbooks — in violation of state laws prohibiting certain kinds of instruction on race and gender. The DeSantis administration says it is scrutinizing these textbooks for "

Popular Information

@[email protected] 5. This is the entire "discussion of lesbianism" within the textbook:

"LGBTQ candidates have also made some headway gaining governmental positions. Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin became the first lesbian elected to the Senate in 2012"

@[email protected] 6. The same review concludes that the "reference of LGBTQ court cases" is an example of "liberal bias" that is inconsistent with state standards.

This is the only LGBTQ-related court case referenced in the textbook:

@[email protected] 7. The review of Civics Alive! Foundations and Functions also claims the discussion of "abortion rights" is "inappropriate." This is how the textbook addresses abortion rights.

@[email protected] 8. One middle school social studies textbook, Florida US History Advanced, was not rejected by the state but did have several issues flagged by a reviewer.

The reviewer writes that "Slavery image on pg. 444 may violate the statute relating to guilt of future generations."

@[email protected] 9. The same reviewer also cites another image that depicts "the life of White plantation owners," which the reviewer believes is "outside the scope of the standard and potentially the law."

@[email protected] 10. If you value accurate, accountability journalism please don't rely on Twitter to get it.

The algorithm here is subject to the whims of a mercurial right-wing billionaire.

Instead, subscribe to Popular Information

It's free to sign up

http://popular.info/subscribe

Subscribe to Popular Information

Independent accountability journalism. Click to read Popular Information, a Substack publication with hundreds of thousands of subscribers.

@juddlegum you only have to look at who he keeps close (Christina Pushaw) to know he not only doesn’t give a damn, but contributes to misinformation.
@godofbiscuits @juddlegum she sounds charming. 🙄
@shadyspotlight @juddlegum I called her out on it, she blocked me. So yeah. She was his spokesperson, now she runs his campaign communications, I believe. Keep her in mind whenever you see him speak.

@juddlegum I love reading your newsletter but I do have one request.

I view emails in simple HTML so there are no pictures. I know there also has to be visually impaired readers out there that can't see images.

Would you please consider adding descriptions of images in your posts for those of us who don't or can't view images? Just a little blurb underneath saying what the image is. This could help make your work more inclusive.

Thank you for the consideration!

@juddlegum so now we can't talk about rich white people in our history books either?
@killfile @juddlegum You can TALK about them... you can say how wonderful and generous they were, and how nice it was that they took such good care of their slaves..er...sorry, "workers who had voluntarily migrated from Africa to the Land of Opportunity."
@juddlegum
The reviewers are pointing at instances which are legal within even De Santis' laws.
@skua @juddlegum but that’s half the point, it’s vague enough that any discussion of race could get flagged, even if the case is ultimately decided in favor of the publisher. So publishers can fight a never ending battle to get new editions of textbooks approved, or take the easy path and pretend that slavery wasn’t that bad and racism ended in 1968.

@theothersimo @juddlegum
I agree that there is pressure on the publishers.
I can see that at least one court case would be necessary for publishers to get a ruling on what De Santis is doing here.
Looks like De Santis would accept a reviewer claiming that the use of black coloured ink causes them feelings of guilt about being white.
I doubt a court would allow the current approach by De Santis to continue.

And a court case would be more spectacle for De Santis to publicise his campaign in.

@juddlegum This picture is anachronistic if the time period in question is during slavery.

From nps.gov: In 1882, Thomas Edison helped form the Edison Electric Illuminating Company of NY, which brought electric light to parts of Manhattan. But progress was slow. Most Americans still lit their homes with gas light and candles for another fifty years. Only in 1925 did half of all homes in the U.S. have electric power.

https://www.nps.gov/edis/learn/kidsyouth/the-electric-light-system-phonograph-motion-pictures.htm#:~:text=In%201882%20Edison%20helped%20form,the%20U.S.%20have%20electric%20power.

#history #histodon #BlackMastodon

The Electric Light System - Thomas Edison National Historical Park (U.S. National Park Service)

@juddlegum nice room, ms. Scarlett could swear it's too French but now it looks typical apartment in Ukraine... I'd go check on those slaves.

@juddlegum All of world history relates to guilt of future generations. How is anyone supposed to learn it?

Incidentally, it is this lack of guilt by future generations that allows neo-Nazis to parade their prejudices from highway bridges...

@toxtethogrady @juddlegum

JFC. Maybe if you want to avoid future generation guilt, try not to do terrible things?

@rx1f @juddlegum It's what I'd recommend, but the hubris of these dudes is they're entitled to do those things. Maybe because their scrawny little bodies burn easily in the sun...
And these guys are supposed to be the "defenders of freedom"?
@juddlegum Those who learn from the past are doomed to not repeat it.
@juddlegum I mean, a real problem with that passage is that it's not remotely true.
@juddlegum Well, it is clearly factually incorrect to claim that conservatives are in favor of “judicial restraint”. They jus twang to restrain judicial decisions they don’t like. MYbe we should review the books and correct those details too.
@juddlegum lol many of us began our lives of activism, as teenagers marching for abortion rights. Good luck telling teenagers their bodies are not their own to govern, without seeding a commitment to a life of social justice activism.
@juddlegum for the record, that's bad, but not for the reason they think it is.
@juddlegum
Hmm, so if State Legislatures instituted Affirmative Action, conservatives would be okay with that? 🤨