I asked ChatGPT about primes ending in 2 to make it prove a point and it proved the point far better than I could have hoped for.
Please do not be a fool who trusts ChatGPT with anything outside your field of expertise, and even then double or triple check what it tells you if you must use it.
@alinanorakari
That's pretty funny. Lest anyone think this was an unfair test of ChatGPT, mathematics is one of its core domains of expertise. (At least that's what ChatGPT told me, but maybe I should know better than to believe a pathological liar twice.)
A while ago I asked it for the 100th digit of ฯ and it was hilariously aggressive that there is no 100th digit. It seemed to be basing that on the fact that ฯ doesn't repeat and there are less than 100 distinct digits, but I think I broke it when I asked about base 100. It eventually informed me that there isn't even a first digit of pi, either.
I will note that the answers it gave you are both (a) shorter and (b) less arrogant sounding. ChatGPT previously was incredibly rude, unable to admit, much less contemplate, possibly being wrong.
I think the problem was that they trained it on transcripts from very smart people. It learned to mimic their charmless assertions and condescending style, but with none of their knowledge.
Alina Yossimouse
abananabag
Andrej Shadura
okanogen VerminEnemyFromWithin