As with most everything else, taxpayers will be covering the costs of the oligarch's mistakes.
@studiofox
"Oh my god! Both of your legs are broken! Let me call an ambulance!"
"NO!!! DO NOT CALL AN AMBULANCE! It's going to bankrupt the hell out of me!"
This is not even a joke.
@Okanogen
eating the rich isn't fun--it's necessary.
as i've said elsewhere, rescue and aide should be a service for everyone on land or sea. the fact that countries can agree to this for international waters but not on their own land is ludicrous and the truly ghoulish thing.
if I had to choose an end - paying 250K to die instantly in a sub and then get heralded around the world as an explorer and genius and all around great chap would definitely outweigh dying slowly from a treatable disease that I can't afford meds for and then get constantly told that it's my fault for not bootstrapping my way up. That's fucking ghoulish.
as for ghoulish:
ghoulish is what happens to the poor who can't get food and are told it's their fault.
or the sick who can't afford treatment and are told it's their fault.
or any of the countless people who aren't blessed to be "normal" in this world and then discriminated against, hurt, killed, looked down on, etc.
ghoulish isn't critiquing 5 people that died in a trash can of hubris. nor is it about critiquing the world's response to them.
the fact that i'm supposed to hold my hat and wipe my eyes for these people without critiquing their fucking actions and their relationship with the broader world is ridiculous.
I'm ok with the fact that won't happen. What I really want is for the company to get FINED so much they implode like their sub. They're in Everett, WA.
Washington's L&I have been calling companies out for fraud and misusing COVID help monies. Washington's AG has sued Amazon, Comcast & handfuls of cellular companies multiple times. This gives me hope.
@juliewebgirl @studiofox I hope the driver's family can sue if it's considered a workplace accident
Idk the situation, but if he was working as an employee or contractor I'd think that's different than being a customer
But heck, the passengers' families might even be able to sue if the vehicle's safety risks weren't fully accurately disclosed or it was known to not have passed appropriate safety tests (IANAL, just my layman assumptions)
Good point about workplace accident. From what I understand the passengers signed injury/death waivers stating the craft was experimental. Not so sure though since safety tests were purposely not done. I have mixed feelings about the CEO. He should be alive to answer for his actions but then again... poetic justice and all that.
Now I heard the CEO always did the driving? LOL If that's true his family should get nothing.
@juliewebgirl @studiofox Negligent damage to a world cultural site and burial ground: $10M fine.
Getting roasted by James Cameron on ABC News for being as reckless as the Titanic captain: bankruptcy.
@studiofox … right? I’m thinking this over … but shouldn’t we, basically just liquidate OceanGate to repay Search & Rescue? 😘 also, we should spend a few $$ on the Coast Guard to upgrade for submarine rescues. 🤷♀️
This rescue effort was Great, but not well prepared, in advance. Should be Coast Guard units ready to do this … like, in all territorial waters, 24/7? especially, as we start running more, and more civilian submarines?
@xanatax the more that comes out now the more ludicrous this is. The navy reported the implosion sound to the coast guard on Sunday so that had a very good idea that the sun was smushed. However, for *reasons* they deployed all the things plus called in private crews. Meanwhile, the coast guard is releasing cryptic ass statements like “until the time is up we have act like this is a search and rescue”.
Ugh.
Like, yeah, I’m down with having a bunch of subs ready to go off and explore and save people and things but man. Transparency.
@studiofox … follow-up, just b/c I said liquidate OceanGate. 🤣 Can I buy all their old subs tho? These things *ARE* “safe-enough,” as long as they never go deeper than people can just SCUBA away from. The tech seems really, quite good, down to 100m, and not-too-bad down to 250m.
4km was waaayyy to arrogant, without lots of lab testing. … but this DIY janky tech, basically fine at SCUBA depth! (a) actually, for real, it’s okay at 100m. (b) at least the exit strategy is obvious!
@studiofox … I can imagine these things being “safe-enough,” anywhere the actual sea-floor, or lake-bed is <125m. So, even if it sank to the bottom, won’t be much risk. Also, that shallow, we can just keep it attached to the support ship. 🤣🤷♀️ We can “hard-wire” things at that range. … including a crane to pull it up, if needed.
Waaaayyy, too greedy, … diving deeper than SCUBA can rescue. but interesting to learn this cheaper tech kinda works, when shallow-only mode!