Meta: "MAY I JOIN YOU?"
Meta: "MAY I JOIN YOU?"

@davidrevoy
For a hot second i thought it is the Grim-reaper from Discworld and thought: Hell yes!
Only then did i realize the signs around his neck...but now i cannot unsee my beloved Grim Reaper who would be actually more fun for the Fediverse when joining.
HELLO FEDIVERSERSE. HOW DOES ONE WORK HERE?
Fediverse: "What is this voice and where does it come from?"
IT IS ONLY IN YOUR HEAD.
Fediverse: "Wait, how does that work? Death uses ActivityPup?"
WHAT IS ACTIVITY PUP?
@davidrevoy Am I misunderstanding the scale of the potential problem?
Like, Facebook can set up their own instance, and then.....? I know that they want money and data (to sell for money), but does making their own instance give them access to data on other instances that isn't already public? Is the concern that a huge Facebook instance sucks up all the oxygen and new users who'd otherwise go elsewhere?
I feel like the naive noob in the room.
Context:
The Cambridge Analytica scandal:
AOC grilling Mark Zuckerberg on Congress (it's not a gotcha, he keeps trying to evade hard questions that he should answer):
Facebook enabling genocide in Myanmar:
People just submitted it. I don't know why. They "trust me". Dumb fucks.
@TranshumanBlues @davidrevoy In short, facebook has repeatedly shown an utter disregard for not only privacy and ethics, but even human life and the rights of minorities, including LGBT groups.
There is ZERO guarantee that Facebook won't scrap our data to train AIs, sell our metadata to the highest bidder or to third parties so they can create massive disinformation campaigns for government and corporations.
We cannot trust them, because they've ALREADY done all the items on that list. Except maybe the AI training. Just maybe.
And then there's the ever present risk of embrace-and-extend.
@TranshumanBlues So it's not the risk that someone will take that data. Facebook will take it, process it and package it ready for consumption.
For a comparison, let's say the data is Uranium. One could say: Oh hey, this is dangerous, we better keep that safe. Mark Zuckerberg sees it, calls the kremlin, and says: Oh hey, we found some uranium ore in there. Pay us and we'll enrich it and build a nuclear warhead for you.
@TranshumanBlues @davidrevoy They can (and will) use posts federated with them to train AI. They can use those data to target ads. Both are behaviors unwanted by plenty of instances. They can start extending protocol in a way incompatible with the rest, lure users to them with more power than anyone else, and then close federation when it's no longer advantageous, gutting Fediverse in process.
It's not a new thing, Google did the same with XMPP and Google Talk. Who now remembers that Google Talk was federated? Facebook's Messenger is XMPP based and FB promised to federate it too - which never happened. Ironically, even WhatsApp is XMPP.
@davidrevoy What a powerful piece of art!
Boost, boost, boost!
@mirabilos Oh true! I forgot about him.
(edit: same about Rose, the fennec star of Mobilizon, and probably more!)
@davidrevoy jesus christ this art is way on point
had a sharp inhale when i saw this appear in my feed, first i thought it was pretty cute or wholesome, then i saw the logos, and... yeah
Meta is covid.
@davidrevoy "but it's an open standard!" mhmyup, u wait for their disproportionate effect on the system; I'll stay campaigning against them at every turn.
They haven't displayed a change in behaviour satisfactory enough to assuage my concerns yet.
Call it paranoia 🙆🏻♀️
#NoToMeta

@davidrevoy Facebook (I'm refusing to call them Meta) has done some good contributions to open source software. Not many, but it exists.
I just want to believe they actually come in peace. I hope. I pray.
Imagine they just federate Facebook and that's it. Wouldn't that be kinda nice? *shivers in fear*
@davidrevoy would you like it maybe featured on https://fedipact.online/ ?
i really really like it