Yup. It's very much like how 20 years ago there were straight people complaining about being called straight. They'd say things like, "I'm not straight, I'm normal! “
38 years ago when we were campaigning for homosexual law reform, I heard heterosexuals objecting to "heterosexual".
Denial of sexual orientation then, denial of gender identity now.
@FuchsiaShock They're all like "how dare you say I'm different to trans women when actually I'm *different* to trans women".
Not one thing they say makes any sense whatsoever.
@serrebi The problem with saying it goes both ways is that one way is significantly more harmful than the other. Cis people villainizing trans people can lead to restrictive laws, abuse, violence ... trans people speaking negatively of cis people can, at most, upset some cis person on the internet.
Not that comparing oppressions is ideal, but it is similar to us blind folks calling sighted people sighties, sightlings, or some other word du jour. Most of the time, that is done either jokingly, or when complaining about actual ableism against us, such as being talked to like a child, grabbed without permission, mocked, etc.
Can it get a little mean-spirited, sometimes? Sure. But it is our way of coping with actual discrimination. Pain is not always pretty; sometimes it is angry.
And far, far fewer people are actually committing violence against, or killing, blind people. Far fewer are not merely not acknowledging we exist, but openly, hatefully saying we should not. That's the trouble with comparing these things. But hopefully it makes the contrast clearer.
@FuchsiaShock
@FuchsiaShock
Over on the birdsite, I once saw someone saying that cis is definitely a slur because it's only ever used to describe people and the only reason anyone would ever need to describe someone is in order to demean them.
Congratulations on almost mastering adjectives. Next week we'll try pronouns.
Except, of course, they don't believe in those either.
I hadn't thought of that. Thanks