@RadoslawMerkx @murshedz It could “destroy misinformation.” But that mere possibility is, at face value, no more likely to be realized than any other associated with this proposed “open discussion.” Since you cite only that possibility, though, do you have some reason to believe that it’d be more likely to come to pass than any other? If so, what is it? And if you don’t have such a reason, what do you think the purpose of holding this “open discussion” would be?