@ablackcatstail Actually it is pretty rare depending on how you chose to run. If you go stable and not use too much alpha software you are pretty good.
I have been running from the testing repo for years and still rolling. Arch has been more stable for me than when I used static release ditros.
@ablackcatstail I have nothing against Ubuntu and other 'commercial' distros actually. I think it is good some distros explore ways to gain revenue differently.
I actually used Ubuntu prior to Arch when I switched 2011. Ubuntu do have some technical disadvantages. Like for me I had to reinstall it every 6 month dist-upgrade as it had some mishap. Ubuntu was the reason I could use Linux only 2008 when I ditched the dual boot.
@ablackcatstail For me it is Arch Linux to the bone though... Arch is so convenient. It handles everything i throw at it and often with ease. No other distro I have tried comes close to it. Which I why I have stuck with it so long.
Just love the KISS principle... ;))