The one not insignificant downside to #ArchLinux is that it seems like updates are pretty nuclear. If you're going to run pacman -Syu, you'd better keep your ass cheeks puckered. LOL! I am sure it's not that bad but you do have to be careful, and in fairness, the Arch folks warn you that care and planning is necessary.

@ablackcatstail Actually it is pretty rare depending on how you chose to run. If you go stable and not use too much alpha software you are pretty good.

I have been running from the testing repo for years and still rolling. Arch has been more stable for me than when I used static release ditros.

@shellkr I was really only being in jest. I think a lot of people hear the words "rolling release" and get scared off. The reality is that Arch is well documented as evidenced by the wiki. Thus far I'm enjoying being able to use it as my blog's server. I use Ghost for blogging and it has some dependencies on newer packages not offered elsewhere other than Ubuntu. #Ubuntu is the only distro I dislike due to political and technical reasons.

@ablackcatstail I have nothing against Ubuntu and other 'commercial' distros actually. I think it is good some distros explore ways to gain revenue differently.

I actually used Ubuntu prior to Arch when I switched 2011. Ubuntu do have some technical disadvantages. Like for me I had to reinstall it every 6 month dist-upgrade as it had some mishap. Ubuntu was the reason I could use Linux only 2008 when I ditched the dual boot.

@ablackcatstail For me it is Arch Linux to the bone though... Arch is so convenient. It handles everything i throw at it and often with ease. No other distro I have tried comes close to it. Which I why I have stuck with it so long.

Just love the KISS principle... ;))