This is not normal.
@davidho As a data vis guy, a chart only showing 7 previous years for something as long-term as the climate and forest fires is not very useful and borderline misleading depending on what previous decades show. I understand there might not be satellite data going back much further but that just means it's not a good source of data for long-term trends.
@jcdenton @davidho 20 years and average is visible here: https://nitter.lacontrevoie.fr/m_parrington/status/1667445233401954305#m - this is carbon emissions, not hectares burnt though. The dataset this is based upon (Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service global biomass burning emissions based on fire radiative power) starts in 2003.
Mark Parrington (@m_parrington)

Perspective on the scale of #CanadaWildfires with #CopernicusAtmosphere GFAS data https://confluence.ecmwf.int/display/CKB/CAMS+global+biomass+burning+emissions+based+on+fire+radiative+power+%28GFAS%29%3A+data+documentation showing the fire locations/intensity across the country & the incredibly steep increase in emissions since 1 May (up to 9 June) compared to 2003-2022 #wildfire #IIFF

Nitter