I find it *really* weird people actually like and defend paid cosmetics in full price games. When did this become accepted to the point that gamers will argue for it?
@gamingonlinux I mean, it's better than full priced games charging you dozens of times for "new" features that should have been in the game to begin with. It's especially better than full priced games having rolling subscriptions or DLC that you have to get to continue really playing because it was meant to be multiplayer and you can't play together if you don't all have it.
@gamingonlinux put another way, I'll take rich people showing off cosmetics to my game becoming (semi)broken any day. And the companies aren't about to accept one and done incomes if they have to keep supporting the product after release.