Academia summed up in one photo:
@nutjob4life Science, knowledge, and education shouldn’t be monetized.

@nutjob4life
I recently found the solution to inaccessible #science papers, it is called unpaywall: https://unpaywall.org/
Using the browser extension immediately found me this: https://www.nature.com/articles/356739a0.pdf

I am not trying to detract from the point here, I also agree this is a real problem and we should be seriously looking at how science is shared with the public. But it is definitely worth spreading the knowledge of this workaround.

Unpaywall

@Duncan @nutjob4life

Unpaywall.org is an undeniable good but it is a tool to discover, it doesn't create open articles. Not all Nature articles have open alternatives.

If academic articles are important to you and you aren't in academia join a library or use the one you're a member of.

For those complaining about academic publishing models ask academics why Impact Factor matters to them.

Then think about the median number of citations articles get, approaching 0

@simon_lucy @nutjob4life
I might have misunderstood that but it seems your argument is: Because we have a broken system where researchers can't get funding or recognition, or even have their findings known about without conforming to the essentially kleptocratic money making rules of journals, we should all conform to the customer side of those rules.

There is also evidence this practice undermines actual scientific progress.

@Duncan @nutjob4life

There's no shortage of avenues to publishing, there are a much smaller number of journals that make a difference in terms of metrics and the economy of metrics that academia has entrapped itself into.

IF, JIF was created for libraries to decide which journals they should subscribe to. In the 50's Journals were peddled to them much like Encyclopedias were peddled to families. A perpetuating model and academia was complicit.

@Duncan
I follow #OpenAccess to lurk their community of academics, librarians, archivists, information scientists, etc. that are vibrant here. I believe more of them are still on Twitter for the time being (same hashtag).

@nutjob4life

@Duncan @nutjob4life There's also the #icanhazpdf hashtag on the flaminghellbird site, seems to be getting some traction in the #fediverse. If you use it with a link to the paper with an email address, a kind academic uses their institutional subscription to retrieve and emails you the paper as an attachment. Then you delete your squawk / toot. That method has helped me out a few times.
@nutjob4life You mean pictures of tweets that complain about pictures of scientific papers or just the scientific papers part?

@nutjob4life

I guess the article is OA for anyone aware of the direct URL [1] but paywalled for people who navigate from the Nature home page. #Unpaywall is definitely very useful here.

In fact, the DOI - absent from the image - 10.1038/356739a0 - contains the info needed for the OA URL.

[1] https://www.nature.com/articles/356739a0

The growing inaccessibility of science - Nature

That science has become more difficult for nonspecialists to understand is a truth universally acknowledged. Here is a measure of the extent of the process.

Nature
@boud @nutjob4life am I looking at the wrong thing or is this really just a two page article. Talk about a good investment!