.
If I remember this movie correctly, when they're torturing Ellen Barkin's character to get her to tell them where the overthruster is, it's in her purse (which she doesn't know) and that purse is made of transparent plastic.
I have to watch this again and see if it's as good as I remember or if it's one of those movies (like Remo Williams) that's better to reminisce about than to watch.
Good comparison. I think it is a movie that stands well for two viewings. The first is *turns brain off* with the second being *what did I just watch*. It is an experience of the unexpected, followed by a metatexual analysis to connote meaning. After that, there is no novelty to hold up for repetition. The philosophy is mostly that your don’t know where it’s going.
cc: @jonny
Jammed full of intentional, well thought out details. But it is a background version of a Jeff Goldblum delivered speech. Yes, there is meaning, insight and even a few puns, but it’s mostly the pauses before the punchlines that draws you into thinking about it in the moment.
Edit: vowel placement
cc: @swordplay
"Why is there a watermelon there?"
"I'll tell you later."
<never does>
(or something to that effect, effing hysterical meta)