New video comin' out soon.

I'm torn between two titles: I'm discussing a problem which is made obvious by electric cars, and I spend a lot of time discussing the specifics of the problem. Most of the video's runtime is spent dealing with electric cars and one-pedal driving.

However, the problem affects pretty much all new cars these days - electric or not.

Should I stick with "Electric cars prove..." in the title for the clicks, or is it better to go with "New cars prove..." ?

"Electric"
35.1%
"New"
64.9%
Poll ended at .

@TechConnectify if it's about destroying physical controls, you can blame Tesla ... That's pretty rage-clicky

I dislike blaming EVs for things not even specific in general: idiots will actually do things that will slow down adoption/etc. But the no-physical-controls thing is clearly Tesla's fault for starting, and they deserve to be called out for it.

@TechConnectify Now that I've watched it ... Your clickbait title might be

"The one thing Tesla (might) have gotten right!". Worth A/B testing that?

@TechConnectify (I'm also required to point out that the accelerometer the Bolt uses isn't extra or added just for this. ABS requires accelerometers in each wheel for normal function, so you car already has 4. Using them for the brake-lights then becomes "just software", and has no per-unit costs)
@kilpatds Do you know that for a fact? It seems somewhat questionable to me to allow a body control module to talk to the ABS module like that
@TechConnectify I am not a citable source, no. Lemme see if I can find you one.

@TechConnectify but for evidence of the connection: your car throws codes when they fail, so they're obviously connected.

See also "unlock&start your car via the headlight" discourse for a general sense of the isolation of car components from each other (none)

@kilpatds Yes, I'm aware they're connected - every module is over the CAN bus. But usually they're limited in what they can say to each other for security and network reasons. While sharing actual sensor data between modules isn't impossible, it doesn't pass my sniff test.

Also... doesn't ABS use wheel-speed sensors?

@TechConnectify Yes?

Which you turn into a deceleration (accelerometer) and compare against possible deceleration/expected deceleration to detect a wheel lockup event.

(I checked, I've lost my contact with the Bolt-tied engineer I knew, so I can't get you proof)

@kilpatds Oh - see, by my standards that would count as you "knowing for a fact"

(also, quite honestly I've never head anyone refer to wheel speed sensors as accelerometers)

@TechConnectify they measure wheel speed rapidly, turn that wheel speed into wheel acceleration, and then figure out if that number's "bad". So they don't measure acceleration directly, no. But they measure (wheel) acceleration as a core element of their function.

Also, I never talked to said Bolt engineer on this topic directly, so by my standards I still don't "know for a fact". :)

@kilpatds No, right, understand that I get the theory of ABS 100% - but truthfully I've never heard it described as detecting differences in wheel acceleration. I mean, yes that's literally what's happening but I've always had it in my inner-monologue that the computer is just looking for improbable mismatches in rotational speed.