Sat next to one of those stupid big imported US tanks at a traffic light earlier. Had a fleeting thought that the roof of my Mini was about the same height as its bonnet.

And yeah, it was.

Those things are ridiculous.

@notjustbikes

@DJDarren @notjustbikes

calling these things "tanks" is not fair to the tank. An M1 tank driver has better forward visibility than the driver of many full-size pickup trucks (source: https://twitter.com/FreckleEars/status/1624137853872574475 )

FEside on X

What was a simple question asked by a redditor turned into one of the most annoying projects I undertook. I posted it over on @FuckCarsReddit as well. Basically this is how far the ground, and more importantly, children can be seen in front of various vehicles.

X (formerly Twitter)

@dmarti Well, tanks are build to be very effective and useful. Observability is a huge part of that, especially if the stuff in front of a tank can kill you.

That the "cars" are not designed with that ways tells another story (about the owners).

@gom yes, tanks are designed with the assumption that the crew and the most likely nearby pedestrians -- friendly infantry -- are on the same side

@dmarti @gom
Finland had a strategy which used this assumption against invading Soviet tanks during the Winter War (1939-1940).

"The essence of the policy was the separation of [tanks] from the infantry, as once on their own the tank has many blind spots and once brought to a stop can be disposed of at leisure."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov_cocktail

"The most dangerous distance away from a tank is 200 yards; the safest distance is six inches." (1940).

Molotov cocktail - Wikipedia

@dec23k
And this shortcomings of tanks are know and mitigated by design if possible. Most 'Trucks' are not designed that way.

Also, I did not think of infantry infront of tanks (humans infront of tanks is stupid). I thought of mines and blockades. Stuff which can be deadly for tanks and crew.
@dmarti