@codinghorror "The productivity software that ran on personal computers was a perfect example of augmentation rather than automation: word-processing programs replaced typewriters rather than typists, and spreadsheet programs replaced paper spreadsheets rather than accountants. But the increased personal productivity brought about by the personal computer wasn’t matched by an increased standard of living."
What will we foster with #AI augmentation? Now's the time to direct.
Word processors were used as an excuse to decimate technical writing departments.
Drafting software was used as an excuse to decimate drafting departments.
Etc.
Whole professions have been decimated and devalued, and quality and professionalism has gone way down as a result.
But hey, it increased corporate profits and bonuses for the execs. 😡
@ve7fim @codinghorror I'm sometimes a cartographer. Today with software I can make a map in several hours to days what used to take a team months to accomplish. So yeah, in me 1 person replaces 5.
But, I also do things inconceivable to even attempt then because of the effort scale. More people get more maps serving more purposes than when I started this gig 3 decades ago. And yeah, with this ease comes a lot of detritus. The professionals are still there though.
The problem isn't new technology. New technology *in the hands of workers* is the best thing ever. Better, safer working conditions, higher quality output, new capabilities, ability to take on bigger projects, quicker turnaround time, etc.
The problem is when new technology is used to devalue skilled workers, to reduce quality, to lower wages, to worsen safety, quality of life, etc.
Here, I see far more of the latter than the former. They're quite open about it now.