Jordan Neely was a person.
Our society left him stranded, and, because of his desperation and our warped priorities, his existence filled people not with sympathy but with fear. Then he was killed, and that is a tragedy, because he was a person.
Iām saying obvious things, because theyāre clearly not obvious to everyone.
Not just that Neelyās death was a tragedy, but that he was a person.
These are controversial propositions.
I know, because there is a controversy.
This outrage is validated in our halls of power and our media as one of many equal competing perspectives, which means that instead of serving as a shocking revelation of collective cultural inhumanity toward one another, it becomes a debate insteadāa *controversial* debate.
So, to repeat: Jordan Neely was a person, a human, and his death was tragic because he had the same measure of humanity as his killer, or you, or me, and observing these facts is one side of a controversy.
Also controversial is any attempt to establish the humanity of anyone who our society has marginalized, which is a word that means āthis humanās humanity has been systematically ignored.ā
To briefly change the subject somewhat, Iāve been told that I ought to make more of an effort to understand other points of view and perspectives.
Thatās interesting, because I am not unhoused or marginalized, so I thought that this is what I was already trying to do.
However, "understanding the perspectives of unhoused or otherwise marginalized people" isn't what is meant.
Whatās meant is that I should try to understand the perspectives of others, who refuse to understand any perspectives other than their own.
Sexual abuse is a crime, and it is the habitual practice of the former president, according to none other than him, for which (along with defamation) a civil jury had just found him liable.
And he also tried to murder Congress and overthrow democracy in the United States.
And he is guilty of many other crimes as well, some of which we watched him do and brag about, others of which we must only presume. And he once took out a full page ad in New York newspapers calling for the execution of some Black kids for a crime they didnāt commit, and so on.
When pressed about doing this years later, he pointed out that there is still disagreement on the matter.
So there's another controversy for you: whether those kids, who killed nobody, killed anybody.
Anyway, mere hours after being found liable to the tune of $5 million for defamation and sexual abuse, the former president and lifetime criminal was given a town hall by CNN, and he immediately proceeded to defame the victim of his sexual abuse.
And his crowd of supporters that CNN picked to clap and cheer everything he said clapped and cheered, which only seems possible if they donāt consider E. Jean Carroll to be a person.
This is the sort of behavior American conservatives really seem to love.
And Iām told by Anderson Cooper that this represents an important perspective for us to listen to and understand.
So Iām going to do that now.
Iām told that Jordan Neely was scary.
And Iām sure sometimes unhoused people are unnerving, even scary, and sometimes do pose a threat, maybe even one requiring self-defense.
Desperation makes people desperate, is something Iāve sometimes noticed.
And Iām often scornfully asked if I would like to share a train car with a desperate person who is behaving aggressively and shouting in a threatening manner.
And I must confess to you: no, that does not sound like fun.
Being the desperate person sounds like less fun, though.
I might make the point that it seems to that it is a chronic and society-deep desperation that seems the problem most in need of a solution, not the people experiencing desperation ā¦ but Iām trying to understand different perspectives, so letās focus on the scariness.
That Jordan Neely was scary would be a hard thing to disprove. All you have to do in order to be scary is to scare somebody, and all that has to happen for you to scare a person is for that person to be scared.
And people are scared of a lot of things these days, and more and more of them think being scared justifies immediately and summarily killing the thing that scares youāand I say āthingā purposefully.
Nobody making this argument seems to be thinking of Jordan Neely as a person.
With each extrajudicial killing of each marginalized person Iāve noticed an unusual rhetorical project immediately begins, in traditional and social media, in conversation, and in peopleās internal structures of belief.
The project involves convicting the victim with a crime.
It's crime that retroactively convicts them of some crime worthy of death, some crime that makes them the perpetrator of their own killing.
This can be any crime at all.
These crimes are usually presented with a sort of rhetorical flourish, a self-evident finishing move against any attempt to establish the killing as tragedy, an obvious proof that justifies the killing and requires no further embellishment.
Again, this can be any crime at all.
In fact, it usually isnāt even a crime.
Trayvon Martin was wearing a hoodie, in case you didn't know.
Jordan Neely didnāt have a hoodie, but he did have a jacket, which he threw on the ground. So thatās something we can learn by considering other perspectives: upper body wear is apparently terrifying.
And Neely was scary, which we know, because *people* were scaredāa categorization that tacitly omits Neely, the only person who didnāt leave the train alive, which makes Neely the person on that train with the most credible claim to fear ā¦ as long as you consider Jordan Neely a person, that is.
But that wonāt do, because if he could have been scared, too, then he would have been justified in killing people on the subway car, tooāat least as justified in killing the man who killed him as the man who killed him was in killing him.
But self-defense is for people, and what makes a marginalized person marginalized in the first place is that they are not considered a person.
Jordan Neely can never defend himself. He can only be the thing people defend themselves from.
Jordan Neely can never feel threatened, even though he was tired, even though he was hungry, even though he had nowhere to live, even though he was the one about to be killed.
Jordan Neely can only be a threatāa threat to *people.*
Jordan Neely can never be scared. He can only be scary.
Being scared is for *people.*
āhe was asking for itā
Certain Americans seem to practically worship their own fears and the violence that indulging those fears creates.
Why has fear become something to be promoted instead of something to be overcome?
A truly strong person would have helped Jordan Neely. It takes more strength to help than to hurt.
Too many Americans seem to think that hurting someone shows strength, when it mainly shows fear.
Everyone feels fear at times. How you deal with it shows whether you are strong or weak.
@FaceliftMcDarby That was the point.
@JuliusGoat "I donāt doubt it can be found in other countries, but I think there may be something unique about American fear."
What terrifies me as a non-American is that this American fear is slowly but surely being exported along with the rest of your culture.
A.R. Moxon, Verified Duck š¦
Sasha Akhavi
Alex Chaffee
Red Faster
Zhi Zhu šøļø
Feynman š“
Ronnie Facelift McDarby
edgeoforever š
Sue Strong
JJ
SusanM
Job
Alexx Kay