@seldo For the most part, you only hear the C-levels in favor of everyone returning to the office. 🤨
I've heard more junior people feel they would benefit from in-person, but beyond that level, the desire to return is negligible – and believed that it would greatly reduce productivity.
So Say We All.
I already knew that dude was a bit of a doofus, but wow.
The corp that I work for has adopted a hybrid structure: Desks in the office for those that want to park at them, but everybody else is WFH, and here have been the effects:
1. Less sick time used; Less vacation time used
2. Higher productivity
3. Higher morale
I get how a guy who trying to sell AI as an employee replacement might not find those to be factors in its favor, but he comes off as the kind of guy who drinks his own Flavor-Aid.
@seldo oh also 4. Lower real estate costs. Kinda a big one.
Also what I suspect amounts to the reason why Apple, and other companies in their position have so strongly opposed WFH: They have a new building to rationalize the cost of, and no cost-effective way to get rid of it.
It’s an obvious time for people to think and write about working from home. I did my own bit yesterday, and today Kevin Roose joined in with this article in the New York Times, with the clickbaity title "Sorry, but Working From Home Is Overrated". Mr...

So, the article was paywalled, why I did not read it. However, it seems from the opening blurb that he is talking in the context of "start-ups"?
From that POV, I think he might have a point. 12 or so people in a new company working to get it started, I imagine a shared location would be beneficial in that context.
Most of us do not work in start-ups, so can disregard advice on how to run one.
Right, and as they all collectively eat and sleep there, you might argue they are in practice "working from home" :)
Joking aside, the reason for choosing this crunch culture is a willingness to gamble that 1) it is a temporary arrangement and 2) it may provide a significant pay-day to compensate for the inconvenience.
Hardcore hacker, you! That worked? That is so bad... :)
Thanks, I will try the same, but I guess it won't change my mind about hybrid and remote work.
Yeah, just read it, using your tip - thanks. It's about the valuation, and my guess is that the majority of his team hold something close to nothing of the total value.
@seldo
Really amazing how many puff pieces CEOs buy in Fortune.
Sam Altman isn't in touch with workers. OpenAI has 706 employees.
Why are his opinions "news?"
Oh, right, because he bought ad space in the form of an "article."
@seldo
Personally I'd love to WFH, but instead I work alone in an office 5 minutes from home, occasionally interacting with co-workers in other locations via email and phone, which is like almost the same thing except with the inconveniences of:
* leaving my house
* taking a packed lunch (or buying)
* limited kitchen facilities (mw, sink & fridge)
* noise disruptions from neighbouring offices including music lessons (noise cancelling headphones not particularly helpful)
* occasional ppl wandering in looking for some nearby business
* leaky toilet that doesn't flush properly
* crappy heating and cooling
The only upsides for me, as far as I can see, is I am in a convenient location for very rare meetings with clients.
I firmly believe the only reason I am required to work in this office instead of at home is so that my boss can pop in randomly (average once a week) to check in on things because he seems to prefer face to face than electronic communications, and he wouldn't feel comfortable dropping in at my home.
The brief (in my location) period of lockdown when I had to work from home for a few weeks, I definitely feel I was more productive because I was in a more comfortable environment (not to mention using a more powerful computer)