Elon Musk took over Twitter six months ago, and his campaign to remake the website has resulted in failure after failure.

On #TechWontSaveUs, I spoke with @MattBinder about the mess Musk has made in rolling out paid verification and scaring off advertisers. We also discuss whether an alternative can challenge Twitter, as a wave of users are moving to Bluesky.

https://www.buzzsprout.com/1004689/12774143-elon-musk-is-destroying-twitter-w-matt-binder

#socialmedia #tech #twitter #elonmusk #bluesky

Elon Musk Is Destroying Twitter w/ Matt Binder - Tech Won't Save Us

Paris Marx is joined by Matt Binder to discuss Elon Muskโ€™s first six months at Twitter and how his obsession with blue checks has decimated the companyโ€™s finances. Matt Binder is a reporter at Mashable and the host of Scam Economy and Doomed. Foll...

Buzzsprout
@parismarx @MattBinder Great episode! love the Blue Tick removal marathon. ๐Ÿ˜‚
@parismarx @MattBinder I think a more salient question would be to ask if there's any substance to the idea that Twitter needs to be challenged. We don't need another Twitter; we need to be able to communicate freely, a concept which seems to be alien to the tech industry.
@parismarx @MattBinder
I enjoyed the interview but also I got a cheer leading for BlueSky vibe that was a bit odd. Sorta a 'Tech Will Save Us' feeling ๐Ÿ˜… Like why give them so much advice on how to just become another Twitter, with billionaire ownership and control and everything?

@MonKaiju @parismarx @MattBinder

Just got around to listening to this episode yesterday and, similarly, came away a bit disheartened.

After listening to this, it sounds like a lot of high profile lefty folk have run away from one billionaire's play toy only to embrace another one.

Mastodon might not be as slick as Bluesky is, for sure, but it doesn't have all the big funding and resources from big right wing silicon valley funders that Bluesky will surely have.

I even read that Mastodon was offered that kind of money but the team rejected it, on principle.

I do get the need to be where other people are at and to make sure that bad politics is challenged in those spaces.

I fully understand that and support people doing that.

At the same time, though, making an asserted effort to support the building of alternatives (as much that does exist) would be nice too.

In the activist/lefty scene, I have ended up defaulting to specialising in only doing tech related stuff because no-one else volunteers for it.

More recently, I've been looking into how I can make those more specialised techy roles as accessible as I can - up to the point that someone like myself doesn't have to be involved at all.

I really want more people to feel comfortable in not just updating content on a website, but as far as being able to set up their own complete web services and for those services to be secure and resilient.

Building the new world in the shell of the old takes time, though.

Whether that refers, generally, to bringing about political change or, more directly, to teaching, learning and building a software ecosystem.

In the activist scene, people don't have any patience, though.

Because change does need to happen right now. Change needed to happen decades ago.

If these big tech emperors could turn back time, though, they would do everything they could to prevent the internet from being as open as it is right now.

If federated social networking is the future of social media, I think it's very clear that we should be doing everything we can to prevent someone like Jack Dorsey shaping that future and do as much as possible to support alternatives.

#BlueSky #BlueSkyWeb

@MonKaiju @parismarx @MattBinder

Also gonna link to a previous rant I had, relating to how a project being "open source" isn't enough to prevent the decisions of a corporate parent having an impact.

https://kolektiva.social/@benx/109513033254315933

benx (@[email protected])

Attached: 1 image Completely unsurprised at finding this buried in the comments of an unresolved issue on Github. The fact that the most popular open source web development frameworks are so dependent on the whims of massive corporations is not a good thing. The core web client for Mastodon is built using Facebook's React framework, fyi. It is obviously very hard to very compete with the amount of resources these companies have, though, which allow their frameworks to become so dominant.

kolektiva.social