Draw a one centimetre square on your finger & hold it towards the Sun 👆

Now consider that some 60 billion neutrinos hit it every second, created by nuclear fusion in the solar core 500 seconds ago 🙀

Even if it’s nighttime & your finger has to point down through Earth’s surface – they don’t care 🙃

But if it makes you feel better, there are only about 2 solar neutrinos in each cubic centimetre of you at any given instant 🤷‍♂️

Well, plus another 300 from the Big Bang 😬

#Astrodon #BigNumberology

@markmccaughrean maybe they make a different universe? like a second layer of world? hmmm....
@markmccaughrean sure, but so far they've proven completely useless.

@FirefighterGeek I dunno – showing that they oscillate between types & thus have mass has given the Standard Model a bit of a shake-up, & won Kajita & McDonald a fair wallop of cash along with the 2015 Physics Nobel Prize.

But arguably the whole point of neutrinos is to make us feel useless & insignificant as they stream through us without a care in the universe. I'd say we need a bit more of that in our lives 🙂

@markmccaughrean Until I can use them to cook popcorn, they're dead to me.

-> This is the serious me acknowledging your point and the value of pure science, it's just not as funny <-

@FirefighterGeek It's the neutrinos that are laughing – almost every one of them will live forever, long after we & our popcorn have become dust blown in the wind of our dying Sun.

-> Momentary seriousness acknowledged in return <-

@markmccaughrean Their laughter is easy to ignore since they are barely capable of interacting with anything. ;-)

@FirefighterGeek @markmccaughrean

They most definitely are not useless. Supernovae are always preceded by a neutrino burst several minutes to hours before other emissions of the supernova become visible to us, giving us precious time to train a whole bunch of telescopes on that region of sky to catch it as it happens.

@FirefighterGeek @atatassault Not true, unfortunately. The only supernova to have been detected in neutrinos was SN1987A & that was only noticed in the data well after the optical emission had been spotted.

@markmccaughrean

How are you defining "instant"? Planck time? Something longer?

@atatassault Infinitesimal. Simple enough calculation: divide the number of neutrinos incident on a square centimetre per second by the speed at which they transit a centimetre (just below the speed of light for neutrinos) to calculate to get the number in a cubic centimetre at any given moment in time aka the volume density of them.
@markmccaughrean TBH holding the finger away from the sun works just as well.
@dgoldsmith Well, kind of. Solar neutrinos are directional, so you can’t hold your finger sideways & get the same number going through that square per second, but yes, holding it the other way around works 🙂 Cosmic neutrino background ones don’t care though: they are *everywhere* 😬
@markmccaughrean There is no meme for J. Frank Parnell and I feel old.
#RepoMan #CultClassics