I was finally getting used to NOT having quote-posts.
Please, can we not hate-share things? Don't QP to dunk. QP to "yes-and," and QP for memes, but don't QP hate into your friends' timelines.
I was finally getting used to NOT having quote-posts.
Please, can we not hate-share things? Don't QP to dunk. QP to "yes-and," and QP for memes, but don't QP hate into your friends' timelines.
Not yet. There's just been an announcement to say that feature is coming soon.
@coral Recreational Anger: read things that upset you so you can feel upset, and share it so other people can be angry along with you and you feel less alone. These things needn't be true to suffice: make some up.
Habitual Disdain: hating someone because you have for a long time, attributing malfeasance to everything they do. Share "information" (truthful or not, it doesn't matter). The more shaming and blaming you put on them, the more easily you can justify your disdain.
These are the textually-transmitted diseases of social media.
@coral will also add that if people *must* use a QP/QT to dunk - make it meaningful and always punch UP.
I'm not even *against* the idea of dunking and callouts per se as they're a way of speaking revolutionary truth to power - what I did hate about the birdsite's take on it was the lateral violence or eliminationist punching down, often on the basis of something out of context/assumed to be the very worst it could be
@coral Like, people need to understand those concepts well before bringing the tool over here to cause more damage.
What I'd just like to tell people is - is the problem resolvable by a single non quote reply to a person (e.g. they unknowingly used problematic language/framing)? Then reply them or DM them. And a few other points... (sorry would put here but my text window overruns)
@coral the most important thing people forgot over there - is it *worth it* because once the QT dogpile is on anyone can see it, anyone can join it - including fascists, stalkers, etc
Sometimes it is - I'd never tell someone to "just block" on a rapist for example. Most times, it isn't worth the splash damage and block/mute/report is a better idea
@coral "they are performing [fill in the blank] INCORRECTLY and-" Mute. Block.
"EVERYONE hates them" Not before that QT they won't.
"but I have PROOF they spent $20 of their fundraiser on weed-" Melon Husk probably spent 20 mil on *crappy* weed. Yell at him. /end π§΅
And honestly, I always thought even punching up was a waste of time if it was a professional troll whose whole living or reputation rested on getting a ton of their haters riled up every day. Seeing that on a bad day from people who should've known better was what finally drove me to dump Twitter for good.
@coral Yes, this. I like quoting when I'm essentially explaining *why* I'm quote tweeting/boosting it, by adding my additional thoughts / context / history on top of the point being made.
Also, I think it's vital that people making posts can mark as to whether or not they want them quotable, so if you know it's something that will bring on the haters you can not make it easy for them.