The US economy is performing amazingly well, but as Bloomberg's Matthew Winkler notes, the public overall doesn't realize that. Why?

He alludes to the key reason for the public's lack of understanding, but doesn't make clear what it is, so allow me to be clear that "media narrative" doesn't explain who's primarily at fault.

The culprit is Big Journalism, again utterly failing to do its job.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2023-04-25/biden-s-economy-deserves-more-appreciation-from-americans

The Truth About the Biden Economy

As the president launches his reelection campaign, his biggest challenge may be getting voters to ignore perception and focus on reality.

Bloomberg
@dangillmor @vmstan would a society whose economy “is performing amazingly well” have people who go into medical bankruptcy? Doesn’t sound amazing to me. Maybe it’s doing “OK, all things considered”.

@chucker @dangillmor @vmstan the answer is sadly yes. If "the economy" does well, that tells us nothing about how the individual members of the society fares.

In fact, the economy could do even better if they just outright ignored people who don't contribute as much to the economy. In fact, I'm sure the economy was doing really well in the society portrayed in William Gibson's Virtual Light.

There are other measurements that take these things into account, but for some reason they're not as popular.

@loke @dangillmor @vmstan I guess my point is that we don’t have to *agree* to those measurements or economic success. We can redefine it to mean “the Gini coefficient is improving”, or “people find their careers more fulfilling”, or “the economy has produced new innovative approaches at tackling climate change”, etc.
@chucker @dangillmor @vmstan true, that would be ideal. It would in fact align better with what people think the term actually means.