One thing that is non-obvious to a lot of folks, and is the reason I'm not jumping to restart a conference over here:

They cost a _lot_ of money, and it's real easy to bankrupt the person hosting them if you're not careful.

My goal is to help build a sustainable ecosystem that can foster conferences for decades to come, not a few years until the current leads burn out.

I believe Ruby Central plays a crucial role in helping to make this a reality.

The other half of this equation are the people.

You have to have a critical mass of attendees to make a conference a reality, and that means consistently attended meetups and events to prove that mass.

You also need organizers and volunteers capable of leading that large of a group. It's not trivial to head up a 1500+ person conference, and we need to acknowledge that.

For me I believe this starts locally through meetup organizers, and organically grows from there.

Meetup organizers become local conference organizers over time, perhaps eventually even regional ones and expanding from there.

That takes time, and we need to cultivate and invest in those leaders.

I'm not saying it can't happen, but that we want this to be sustainable and carry on for generations beyond the initial organizers, and that investment is constant and ongoing.
@baweaver so, one thing that happened in many places was that the original meetup/conference organizers burned out and for whatever reason there was no succession.
@noelrap Yeah, that's one of the biggest issues: there's very rarely a succession line or people ready to take up that mantel next.

@baweaver @noelrap I’ve seen this in action. At lone star there was a handoff but then the person who took over quit after one year.

With keep ruby weird we didn’t have anyone knocking down our door and also were protective of the brand. It’s really hard to give up something personal if you don’t know how well it will be implemented.

I would recommend a one day, single track conf for anyone looking to start.

@baweaver @noelrap One semi-surprising element: there’s very little in it for the conference organizers. Less recognition than speaking. Definitely not a financially motivated act. You don’t even get to enjoy your own conference because you’re there running it.
@baweaver @noelrap lots of the long running confs have secondary drivers. They’re consultancies looking for work (and have a plethora of people on hand) or they’re a book publisher or they have external funding or motivation some other way.
@Schneems @baweaver What happened in Chicago is that the consultancy that ran the user group and regional conference got bought by another consultancy that proved to be less motivated to keep them both going.