Mastodon MigrationApr 27, 2023

When you post on Twitter(1) or Bluesky(2) you grant them a broad perpetual license to use, modify, and sublicense your content. You effectively make them co-owners of your content. They can mine it and monetize it. They can even sell it. When you post on Mastodon(3) most instances take no license at all. That's right, they tell you what they are doing with your content—storing posts and delivering them—but no license.

1/2
#twittermigration #TermsOfService #PrivacyPolicy #ContentLicense

Show threadMastodon MigrationApr 27, 2023

Twitter and Bluesky (and almost all corporate social media providers) say they need a broad license to do what they do. But the truth is that they don’t need a license to publish your content—or they could take a much more limited publishing only license—but they don’t because the way they make money is processing your content, profiling you, and selling information about you to ad tech companies. For this they need to co-own your content.

2/3
#twittermigration #ContentLicense #Bluesky

Show threadmonbrielleApr 28, 2023
@mastodonmigration if fact you are twisting the TOS. In order for them to operate, they need to be able to promote the app. That means, they will take screenshots of Bluesky, which will include users’ content. That said, they have explicitly told us community that if we are using our content in a way we disapprove of, please we can email them
Show threadLanda 
@monbrielle @mastodonmigration why would they „need“ to make screenshots with real customer content for their promotions?
It might be more convenient, but they could just as well use their own accounts or ask the author of the message/image/video for explicit permission, the same way news agencies (should) do when reusing videos or
Images from social media posts.
Apr 28, 2023 at 4:33amWeb