In fairness to them, they're trying to build in public, and didn't expect this much attention yet.
They opened their invite-only private beta, where they hoped to control a tiny user list, before they'd even implemented blocks.
Sign-ups are protected by sign-up keys, but unfortunately, they didn't rate-limit their sign-up API, and the keys were quite short, so someone wrote a script to brute-force guess sign-up keys. So some nazis got in. 🤷🏿‍♂️
Blocks are being implemented this week.
@runewake2 @seldo Probably? But "they" haven't built social networks before. The BlueSky team is 5 people, lead by Jay Graber. They wasted 5 years trying to make crypto happen, then (hopefully) realized that crypto sucks, is not going to happen, and ruins lives, but that Merkle Search Trees are kinda cool, and didn't the web used to be more fun way back when. So they made BlueSky.
She has a suspect investor / board member, but Jack is not building this. All praise/criticism should go to Jay.
@mekkaokereke @seldo I really think we're past the point of claiming ignorance of these issues though? Like these issues feel really well documented and the harm from moving fast and breaking things is also *very* well known. As engineers working on large scale systems there is a responsibility to consider these things and forgoing that for the sake of moving fast is an intentional choice.
What I'm saying here is that it was a business decision and choice for BlueSky to welcome these people.
@glyph @mekkaokereke @runewake2 @seldo
Their motto seems to be "move fast and break things (that were built by or belong to other people, and it's those folks who'll have to pay to repair or replace what you damaged because they can't afford to sue you)".
@CatherineFlick @mekkaokereke @seldo
When you ask on BlueSky why blocking isn't implemented, you get referred to an airy, wandering theoretical post about how there are Interesting Technical Questions To Be Answered. Server level or client? Public or not? What about servers which don't respect blocking?
Completely bonkers that they think "interesting philosophical questions, amirite?" is a valid response.
In other words, they are abysmally incompetent.
True. But let me share this about Mastodon...
Many Black Fedi users, including me, have received comments on their posts including graphic images and videos of real humans being murdered, along with racist slurs. Most white Mastodon users don't even see these threats, because of how comments and replies work on Mastodon.
When Black users complain about this, they're told to CW the discussion of their own abuse, but the abuse vectors don't get closed. And it's been years. 🤷🏿‍♂️
"All N-words should be killed and hung from trees!" Along with images of burned Black bodies from a lynching.
Black users see this, but other users on their instance don't, because of how replies work. When Black users talk about it, they're told to CW the discussion. Then told "This is how Fedi comments work! WAI! WONTFIX. Just move servers! (And lose all your posts!)"
Alternatively, some white users will say, "I've been on Fedi for years and I've never seen anything like that!"
No, I'm not saying this gives Jack Dorsey a pass. It doesn't. No passes for him.
I'm saying that moderation sucks for Black people everywhere, and for many Black users, including me, Mastodon is by far the worst moderation experience they've ever had on any social media. And lots of Mastodon users just don't want to accept that.
And BlueSky isn't Jack. It's Jay Graber. Give her her agency. All credit or blame should go to her. Jack is just one of her questionable board members.
I appreciate the point, but I think that undersells Jack's influence. He started Bluesky and as far as I can tell he's the only funder. It's effectively his company. https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/bluesky-514d/company_financials