I’m so confused!

At first @film_girl dismisses worries about defaulting to mastodon.social as “drama and virtue signaling”.

Then she says that migrating from mastodon.social to elsewhere has a big cost because you “can’t take your posts with you.”

Well, this is why mastodon.social shouldn’t be set as the default server to join: stuff like full text search aren’t supported on it, while that feature is supported on other servers.

This concern isn’t virtue signalling.

https://mastodon.social/@film_girl/110256874238800861

Also, we have to set out the metric for success.

Is our goal to have 100 million accounts on mastodon.social while every other server only has one account?

If that happened, I believe Mastodon would be a failure as a decentralized project.

Mastodon’s success isn’t that 11 million people use it. It’s that it’s part of a network of 24,569 nodes.

The problem is—and I can’t stress this enough—that certain people just want a Twitter replacement.

They’re not looking long term. They’re not considering future implications on network infrastructure. They’re not foreseeing that a temporary solution could potentially become permanent.

The goal here isn’t just to get everyone off Twitter, it’s to destroy Big Social.

And how to do that? Decentralize!

But if you re-centralize on one server, the Fediverse is as good as dead.

If your intent is to push people off Twitter towards mastodon.social, then Twitter has won.

Elon musk has a net worth of $174B.

And mastodon.social has a tiny sliver of $300,000 a year.

If Mastodon is re-centralized, it is in a fight that it cannot win. It just takes Elon Musk to buy it outright for the game to be over.

But if Mastodon does what it does best—decentralization—then it will win because Mastodon *cannot* be bought!

Some people might believe that decentralization is mere idealism, but in fact it's practical.

Yes, centralization is "easy" in more ways than one.

It is easy for onboarding -- but also easy for Big Social to acquire.

Decentralization is hard for onboarding. It is also hard for Big Social to acquire.

I've alluded to this earlier today.

https://mastodon.social/@atomicpoet/110255664058403160

I think there's a happy medium between "join the default" and "choose one of 10,000 servers".

Maybe that medium is a wizard that helps people find their *best* Mastodon server.

@atomicpoet if mastodon does a full transfer of accounts it could be: register by default on your temp home mastodon.social you remain in it for 30 days meantime you find a better place or based on your post and bio mastodon suggests a better server and you click a button and move to that. This effectively could be something all service providers can use given that the software allows full transfer of account.
@anant Except, you can't take your posts with you!

@atomicpoet that was the "if" part in my post. I think i didnt made that clear enough.

What i meant was we should try to get mastodon to do a proper transfer and then all sorts of possibilities open up