@dangillmor The fact that one can buyout of cases is a problem.
Because it means that certain things are only illegal for poor people.
@kkarhan @dangillmor I don't know much about law, but wouldn't this still be a significant court precedent? While it's true that no one is getting convicted, they would be more exposed to it in a future case. This settlement could also encourage other parties to try to drain more money (and maybe even get a guilty verdict) out of them too.
**Updated for clarity**
780 million
No non disclosure agreement. Fox admitted in the settlement statement that falsehoods were told on air
Not exactly no penalty
.
@cujobyte @yaitorr @bigsmiffy @dangillmor actually, no.
#FoxNews isn't obligated to anything beyond ceasing and decisting in the future.
They ain't even forced to admit kowingly lying to the public - something they legally fought for to be their "right" over a decade ago!
That's not even an effective SLAPP, but a mere "don't do this again" warning.
The real winners are the lawyers cashing in a few % of the sum - like a #ClassAction.
@cujobyte @yaitorr @bigsmiffy @dangillmor
Or as some people will point out again:
"If the penalty for wrongdoing is a payment then it's only illegal for the poor!"
Thus #classism prevails...
https://www.theverge.com/2020/2/3/21120476/jeff-bezos-washington-dc-renovate-apartment-home-parking-tickets