It’s great to see mastodon showing up meaningfully for things like the Texas Observer, but it seems—from my subjective POV—super uneven. Making a really strong case for the best parts of, for example, bookworld/literary twitter to put down stronger roots here is going to take active support and community-building, especially when most journalists are still not active here (and are frequently reviled for being journalists at all).

Right now, a lot of fedi advocates are asking authors and artists to leave the social media sites that have allowed them to get by, but without doing much/anything to support those newcomers once they arrive here—even leaving aside the old-guard pushback against “self promotion.”

And idk, “staying on twitter for your work makes you the object of my disgust,” is maybe not the persuasive tool a lot of people here seem to believe it is. 🤷🏻

Please definitely post here with your favorite counterexamples and thriving zones, I want to be wrong in my cranky feelings!

@kissane

Nope.

Continue on in your crankiness.

@PricklyPam @kissane

The only reason I began using Twitter was for the breaking news and the journos. I figured out how to bypass the algo and make it work like this site does. It turned into a great news feed.

Then, in February, "improvements" took that away and weeks would go by without me seeing a single tweet of many of the journos I followed. I tried, but couldn't make it work.

It was disappointing, but I hope more of the journos will come here.