@juddlegum WTH? Now the kid's a target along with anyone near him such as family, friends, schoolmates...

@yesbiscuit @juddlegum she’s an adult.

@Ghostcatloki @yesbiscuit @juddlegum And that makes doxxing an innocent person acceptable in what way, again?

@turboquokka @yesbiscuit @juddlegum it is not doxxing to publish a picture of a public figure’s adult daughter. Is it detestable? Yes. Would I do it? No, but acting like it’s somehow criminal is absurd, it’s the worst face of free speech, which we have to defend whether we like it or not, so that we can have free speech at all. The judge is a public figure and that carries consequences whether we agree with it or not.

@Ghostcatloki @turboquokka @yesbiscuit @juddlegum So you’re saying taking the circumstances, timing and context, it cannot be seen as intimidation to post the photo of a judge’s relative to a site known to support and incite violence against liberals they don’t agree with?

@MelodyCooper @turboquokka @yesbiscuit @juddlegum I think you’re already embelllishing by calling Truth Social a site known to incite violence. In fact that is a whole separate charge against TS you’d have to prove before you could use it as an argument against Don Jr. Posting a picture on said site and then prove HIS intent was to intimidate or threaten someone. What you know and what you can prove in court are rarely the same.

@turboquokka @MelodyCooper @yesbiscuit @juddlegum the only point you’ve made is that you can link to a bunch of articles that all say the same thing, and none of them include anyone actually being able to make a legal case against Trump, or his son, for the words they’ve spoken and pictures they’ve posted. You’ll notice out of all the cases facing Trump, NONE of them allege he illegally incited violence through words and tweets.