@foxgloved The thing that immediately prompted this thought was probably talking about reproductive labor and just calling it "caring" to make their point seem more academic and abstract despite the fact that what they were saying made more sense for reproductive labor specifically and under the current regime specifically. But, taking it as abstract, I'd include everything from that to watching kids to healthcare to hospitality to anything where being mindful of someone else's needs is the idea.
I don't engage with "we're not in that world yet. I don't orient my principles based on what people perceive as possible. It's more valuable to imagine what's right because plenty of people put all their work into managing (and maintaining) things as they are already.
With that in mind, wealth is a hierarchy in itself and that remains true regardless of how mindful we are about parceling it out. It is impossible to balance a cumulative symbol of power in a "fair" way. So I don't think it is possible to even provisionally accept ideas like "compensation" or "fair compensation" for seriously progressive ends. In the end, we will just continue to have what we have because we will be fighting for the system that is oppressing us squarely within the logic of the system that is oppressing us.