Taxation is theft.
Rents are a form of tax.
Taxation is theft.
Rents are a form of tax.
I’m not sure why we’d need taxes to fund roads, since roads existed before taxes.
- Roads predate states. States are much older than either the Roman state or the medieval period. We don’t need taxes to have roads.
- States don’t tax to fund spending.
- Coercion is bad. If people have to be coerced into doing something, it’s probably not worth doing. If it is worth doing, then people will probably do it without being coerced.
- The usefulness of coercion to you is not a good justification for coercion.
“People living thousands of years ago didn’t have asphalt” is not a particularly good argument for the state.
The observation that people in nonstate societies without taxes still have roads is empirical, not idealist.
Not sure if your dork car can handle roads in places like Chiapas, but, again, your argument seems to boil down to “men with guns should extract resources at gunpoint to fund amenities for me and my dork car” which still isn’t compelling.
So to be clear, you’re acknowledging that you’re happy men with guns coercively extract resources and compel labor so you can comfortably drive your dork car around?
Can you identify where I’ve said that?
What do you think taxes are? How do you think the state compels people to pay taxes? Does the state threaten to, say, tickle you if you don’t pay your taxes? Or maybe something a little harsher?
My alternative is “people freely and voluntarily engaging in cooperative effort,” but a critical identification of taxes and rents as theft does not rely on presenting an alternative.
Chiapas, Zomia, Tristan da Cunha, any time you and your mates get together and buy each other a round.
Oh whew I was really worried there for a sec