Taxation is theft.
Rents are a form of tax.
Taxation is theft.
Rents are a form of tax.
Iām not sure why weād need taxes to fund roads, since roads existed before taxes.
- Roads predate states. States are much older than either the Roman state or the medieval period. We donāt need taxes to have roads.
- States donāt tax to fund spending.
- Coercion is bad. If people have to be coerced into doing something, itās probably not worth doing. If it is worth doing, then people will probably do it without being coerced.
- The usefulness of coercion to you is not a good justification for coercion.
āPeople living thousands of years ago didnāt have asphaltā is not a particularly good argument for the state.
The observation that people in nonstate societies without taxes still have roads is empirical, not idealist.
Not sure if your dork car can handle roads in places like Chiapas, but, again, your argument seems to boil down to āmen with guns should extract resources at gunpoint to fund amenities for me and my dork carā which still isnāt compelling.
So to be clear, youāre acknowledging that youāre happy men with guns coercively extract resources and compel labor so you can comfortably drive your dork car around?
Can you identify where Iāve said that?
What do you think taxes are? How do you think the state compels people to pay taxes? Does the state threaten to, say, tickle you if you donāt pay your taxes? Or maybe something a little harsher?
My alternative is āpeople freely and voluntarily engaging in cooperative effort,ā but a critical identification of taxes and rents as theft does not rely on presenting an alternative.
Chiapas, Zomia, Tristan da Cunha, any time you and your mates get together and buy each other a round.
Oh whew I was really worried there for a sec
Not sure why youāre so reluctant to answer the question, or why you think so little of people that you canāt imagine them engaging in voluntary cooperation.
So to you, people engaged in voluntary cooperation is as fantastical as dragons?
After watching people for the last 20 years or so, and studying much more of history, I would say emphatically that voluntary empathy/co-operation is about as realistic as dragons for most people.
The vast majority of modern governments are deeply broken, to the point that I do not believe that they can be fixed. That doesn't mean that some sort of more equitable system won't need to be built.
My personal ideal is a democratic federation very similar to the Fediverse. Some baseline stuff (like infrastructure, education, and Healthcare) helps EVERYONE so everyone can help fund it. Otherwise the groups sort themselves out and leaving for another area should be easy and cheap.
Strong centralized power is ALWAYS bad but co-operation for the common good sometimes requires co-operation instead of requesting.
Is it your understanding that the people of Chiapas live in huts as hunter gatherers?
In any case, no, thatās not my argument, but Iām starting to wonder which part of āanarchist communistā you misunderstood when you decided to follow me.