@matthew_d_green As Joachim Türk of the Deutsche Kinderschutz Bund (biggest childprotection org in Germany) put it in our hearing with the German Goverment:
„Privacy is a child’s right, we can not play one right against the other. Every legislation that leads to children feeling surveilled must be rejected“ (freely translated)
Read up here:
https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2023/kw09-pa-digitales-928540
Children have a right to privacy.
What conservative people mean by "children's rights" is really "the parent's rights to treat their children as private property", and is a fucking violation of children's rights.
@matthew_d_green I had to reread that phrase several times.
Because... children have some right to privacy as well.
This phrase doesnt make logical sense. We destroy everyone (including children's) privacy rights... to protect children?
But then children arent protected.
Perhaps as them to opine on the Church fighting tooth and nail against laws that require them to report abuse even if they learn of it in confession.
Its happening and that person might explode... win win
@Thad @matthew_d_green That seems to be the implication in the statement, which I find disturbing in what it hints at.
The kind of parents that constantly spy on their children and disregard their privacy (and deny their right to it, usually with some nonsensical fallacious reasoning) cause significant damages.
@matthew_d_green something something trading privacy for safety losing both
(yeah i know it's a misquotation but that's not the point)
@matthew_d_green I wonder how exactly that works given the fact that children should have a right to privacy.
So it ends up "children's right to privacy should override privacy rights" which doesn't make a whole lot of sense.