***PLEASE BOOST***

Daylight Savings Time changing of hours back and forth:

Is dumb and should be abolished.
89.1%
Makes perfect sense and should be kept.
10.9%
Poll ended at .
@reay it is dumb and should be abolished, but it should not be replaced with something even dumber such as permanent DST.
@nottrobin @reay there are proposal to abolish DST by permanently shifting the clocks one hour behind solar time (permanent DST)
@oblomov
So what should it be replaced with?
@reay
@nottrobin @reay standard time.
@oblomov
Just based on this thread, people seem to prefer dst
@reay

@nottrobin @oblomov @reay Permanent DST has been tried already back during the Nixon Era and was reverted within eight months. It's one of those things that seems fine at first, but the cons outweigh the pros.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/what-happened-the-last-time-the-us-tried-to-make-daylight-saving-time-permanent-180979742/

What Happened the Last Time the U.S. Tried to Make Daylight Saving Time Permanent?

A 1974 switch to year-round DST proved unpopular, with Americans expressing "distaste" for the long, dark winter mornings

Smithsonian Magazine

@nottrobin @oblomov
DST, I’d think.

Or whatever system most countries use, a) provided it works well for them, not causing ongoing undue accidents, etc., and since b) most countries on the planet already don’t do a time change at all (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_saving_time_by_country ) so this would bring us more in line with everyone else’s times anyway.

Daylight saving time by country - Wikipedia

@reay
Yes, I'm asking what's wrong with DST as the solution, what's better.
@oblomov

@nottrobin @reay

DST has no geographical meaning. Ideally, each meridian should use its own Standard time (midday with Sun at its highest point). This is impractical, which is why we use timezones where you have an error of ±30 minutes “almost everywhere” (there are exceptions for political reasons). Permanent DST would make the time wrong by _at least_ half an hour (generally more) almost everywhere.

@nottrobin @reay

If the objective of DST is to get mor daylight work hours, just start working earlier. There's no need to shift the meaning of time for that. It's perverse.

@oblomov
I understand your argument. I completely disagree. The 24 hour clock is a human construct, not a fundamental property of the universe. The important thing is what time best serves humanity. It's not that the sun is at its highest at 12, which serves no practical purpose that I can think of.

I understand your point that we could "simply" change society to operate to different times of day but in practice this is a sociological impossibility. DST is correct.
@reay

@oblomov
Fitting the clock to suit human society, to make it lighter for longer into the evening, has significant benefits in reducing energy use and associated emissions. This matters immeasurably more than some puritanical desire to use sundials.
@reay

@nottrobin @reay

Sure, so why don't we go back to the ancient times when daylight was divided in 12 hours regardless of how long it was. That gave the most flexibility.

@nottrobin @reay
The choice of 24 hours in a day is a human construct, but midday being when the Sun is at its highest is not.

The claim that changing society to operate at different times is a “sociological impossibility” is preposterous. We've been doing it _every single year_, _twice a year_, for a century now. DST itself is an extremely recent invention made nearly exclusively to the benefit of the industrial owners. It is not to the benefit of humanity.

@oblomov
You've got it backwards. Everyone keeps going to work at 9am regardless of whether it's DST or Standard time. What's much harder is persuading all of society at once to start work at 8am.
@reay
@nottrobin @reay
Wrong. We don't go to work at 9am. We shift 9am to a different time and pretend it's still the same. So we all go to work an hour early but call it by a different name to pretend it didn't change. And suffer from jetlag because of it.
@oblomov
Yes exactly. Shifting 9am to a different time is the easy way to persuade society to start work earlier or later. Which is why DST is a good policy. Most people get it.
@reay
@nottrobin @oblomov @reay
For blue collar workers making daylight savings time permanent would be detrimental. We don't work 9-5 jobs. Our normal day usually starts around 7 if not earlier. In winter this is normally at or before sunrise. So by making it permanent we would start an hour or 2 before sunrise. Making job sites more dangerous because of low to no visibility. If they want business to have more daylight change business hours nor ours
@grey_ghost @nottrobin @oblomov Got that each time you posted it. 🙂
@reay @nottrobin @oblomov
I was reposting it to different conversations in the thread.
Sorry about that though
@reay @nottrobin @oblomov
The two different threads both assumed everyone works 9-5, and forgets that different jobs start at different hours of the day
@nottrobin @oblomov @reay actually, health wise standard time is “correct”. I say shift by 30m and everyone is equally annoyed. https://www.colorado.edu/today/2022/03/28/why-permanent-daylight-saving-time-bad-idea
Why permanent daylight saving time is a bad idea

When Senators Marco Rubio of Florida and Edward Markey of Massachusetts introduced the bipartisan Sunshine Protection Act earlier this month, they rattled off a

CU Boulder Today
@oblomov @reay Permanent standard time is best, but almost nobody wants to admit that.