@sayyid_qishta I've been thinking about the concept of paying for what it actually costs people to work. (as in increase where necessary etc).
So are you disabled? You get paid more.
Do you need to commute? You get paid more.
etc etc etc. (It's not a compelte thought for fairly obvious reasons, so the examples are very vague and general)
@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] Sorry, writing from Germany here. While we're quite capitalist here as well, some remnants of the social market economy idea (and partially probably just inertia) prevented us from reaching hellscape level.
@jnbhlr @maloki @apukwa @sayyid_qishta Portland is NOT affordable.
And what's the POINT? I dunno, being able to feed their kids, pay for medications, keep the health insurance that keeps them alive???
If you aren't from the US tossing out suggestions that assume a robust safety net, legal worker protections, or any of that isn't helping. We're not stupid over here, we're climbing an ENORMOUS hill and dismissing that isn't helping.
@jnbhlr I just got tired of you not stopping.
The whole initial point was "what does it cost you to work., you should Get paid so it's doable to work on job or fewer hours because the extra costs involved".
But you started with that commuting is a choice, which it's not in in most places.
This last post wasn't horrible or anything, but it was just that you had started with arguing about something and not listening. So I had enough. 🤷♀️