Don't like strangers busting into your mentions to give unsolicited opinions?

This could be solved if the Fediverse had better comment controls.

You should be able to make a read-only post if you want.

And you should be able to make a public post that's only writeable to followers.

You should also be able to lock a thread if it becomes a vector for abuse.

"Just make locked posts" is the worst response to this because that so-called "solution" basically tells people to reduce their visibility.

Many people don't want their visibility to be reduced.

However, they want a reduction in harassment.

In fact, much of the "I don't want search to exist" crowd exists due to lack of comment control.

People don't want to be found on search because they can't control the potential replies that might occur through a search vector.

I know this because plenty of the anti-search crowd wants public visibility -- but they don't want harassment.

No, a public post doesn't mean "talk to me".

Public means "publicly visible".

It's about being *read*.

Reading is different from writing.

Just as there's different settings for visibility, there should be different settings for replying.

On Mastodon, there's different visibility settings. They are:

* Public
* Unlisted
* Follower-only
* Mentioned people only

I think you could largely apply this to reply settings as well.

Except, reply settings could be:

* Public
* Local-only
* Follower-only
* Mentioned people only

If there were a way to prevent comments through search results, that would be good too.

It's funny. Regarding potential comment control on the Fediverse, people who are "pro" and "con" tend to be divided along gender lines.

Dudes tend to not want comment control đŸ¤”

But there's a lot of women who very much want this feature. Many of them are DMing me privately to express support -- and that should tell you everything.

This entire thread is literally reply guys who are sad about a possibility that they might not be able to reply đŸ˜†

But seriously, the reply guy problem on Mastodon is embarrassing.

And it really puts a dent in the whole argument that Mastodon has got rid of social media toxicity.

Of course, that's not true. People have been complaining about reply guys for years.

It's becoming so bad that "Well, akshually..." has become a Mastodon stereotype.

This is why it's better to have more moderation tools, not less.

This reply guy thinks he's "literally entitled to harass".

No, he's not.

@atomicpoet To me there's context missing to develop an opinion. Yes the sentence you marked is at least questionable If not detestable. None the less, ibelieve i understand the message he wants to Pass. It's possible english is not his first language and he did not use the word he wanted to use. I assume he did not meant "harass" but "bother" instead. And you change the words, his statement got a point.

@GamingGhosti That guy is a self-described journalist. He knows how to use language.

And harassment means harassment.

@atomicpoet It is not about him knowing usage of language but him speaking concerning language as first language. An example: Harassment in german is Belästigung and Bother in german is Belästigung as well. The difference lies in context and connotation and synonyms. My question is: is his mother tongue english or not. If yes, his statement is detestable. If not, to me it is then hard to judge
@GamingGhosti You can literally look him up and see if he can speak English well enough to understand the meaning of "harassment".