"This spring, a woman named Jessica Burgess and her daughter will stand trial in Nebraska for performing an illegal #abortion — with a key piece of evidence provided by #Meta, the parent company of #Facebook. Burgess allegedly helped her daughter find and take #pills that would induce an abortion. The teenage Burgess also faces charges for allegedly illegally disposing of the #fetus' remains.
"TechCrunch reported internal chat logs were provided to law enforcement officers by the social media company, which indicated the pair had discussed their plan to find the medication through the app."
@LibertyForward1 That won't make a difference. Google and Facebook already know everyone's gender and sex, and they can easily filter out those searches.
The issue right now is that law enforcement is asking for information on specific people.
@FiftyShadesOfHey @chadloder No for firefox. Mozilla corporation can collect, sells and gives to police: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/policy/transparency/
Yes for duckduckgo, they don't even collect.
(1/2)
Time for basic data security:
Get a a mail account in a safe country, e.g. Switzerland or Germany.
Use different mail acounts for different objectives/log-ins. (Guess what the common denominator in personal data search usually is? ;))
Delete #facebookdown (or at least all content).
Remove all cookies upon closing your browser.
Use Opera or Firefox (for Windows) and not Chrome or MS Edge or whatever.
Stop using Google search (DuckDuckgo instead)...
(2/2)
...
Invest in a performing VPN.
Neve use passwords for more than one app or website.
(for those who don't do this already)
If you use "incognito" or "private" mode, your browser will delete all cookies when you exit the browser.
(Yes, you do have to log in by hand to your oft-used websites, but that's hardly a price to pay).
Disconnect your Nest and home products from google amazon and apple. End voice apps, stop google voice from running etcetc.
@chadloder this is terrifying, and I do agree with nearly all the comments here about op sec, privacy focused email, etc.
But, as others have hinted at, do you think that we (in this thread), who are generally a niche of a niche of a niche of very informed or highly technical users, will actually see the masses actually utilize these tools? (TOR, VPNs, DNS and Script ad blockers)
The masses are ignorant - and I mean in the naive way - of all of this.
We need systemic change via legislation.
@chadloder further, how many of us are using iOS or Android?
How many of use a mapping application to get from point a to b?
Everything is tracked unless you full stop unplug from the way these companies have hyper connected us.
And on top of that, there are many who will be heavily disincentivized to leave these services because their livelihoods depend on it.
I don't like being pessimistic, but we can't educate the masses, and the masses fuel all of this data collection.
@chadloder we have to change the laws that allow companies to collect, sell, and exploit this data.
Unfortunately that will require electeds to not care about being reelected, and basically to fall on their sword for us, which... Never/rarely happens.
Either we will see a mass exodus from these services because there are a massive amount of these stories and everyone fears for their own selfish interests, or we have to start at the top and legislate away all this data hoarding.
No data protection laws in America is the problem,
More stories on police getting access to home video and microphone regardless.
If you've ever had sex, if pregnancy is a word you might use, if anyone something-none-of your-business-someting abortion, then Remove Surveilance Devices.
https://mstdn.social/@kashhill@mastodon.social/109990190478341656
Fascinating story: https://www.politico.com/news/2023/03/07/privacy-loophole-ring-doorbell-00084979 At first the police just wanted two hours of footage from this guy's doorbell Ring cam. "It was just the beginning. They asked for more footage, now from the entire day’s worth of records. And a week later, Larkin received a notice from Ring itself: The company had received a warrant, signed by a local judge. The notice informed him it was obligated to send footage from more than 20 cameras — whether or not Larkin was willing to share it himself."