@Alephwyr @rechelon To be fair, it's not even possible to have a comprehensive understanding of postmodernism unless you study it professionally. It's hard enough just to get a grasp on what a single postmodern scholar theorized. It's all just so convoluted. This makes it difficult to criticize because there's a lot of nonsense to sift through.

Of course, this points out another problem with Peterson—that he pretends to have a comprehensive understanding of everything.

@autolycus @Alephwyr @rechelon sure but the basic stuff thats trivially correct like the connection between knowledge and power (which plenty of other thinkers outside the tradition have pointed out for ages) what he's supposedly railing against and can be engaged with without once mentioning foucault or derrida or whatever