People focus rightfully on Fox News as the main media outlet to carry the message for Trump and Republicans, but there is also a very large adjacent pundit class with figures like Joe Rogan, Lex Fridman, and Tim Urban who basically have built a permission structure for conservatives to see themselves as liberal and to utterly ignore how extreme the Republican Party is.

Who else would you put in this group? I'd also say that many of these people don't even know that they're doing this.

@mattsheffield bill maher and the elite 'liberal' comedian class
@bcham Yeah he's definitely around there, but he does have the sense to say that Trump is not someone people should be supporting at least.
@mattsheffield the Weinsteins, Tiabbi, Greenwald, Weis. Jimmy Dore - my “communism has never been tried” type leftists and hard R acquaintances both post his clips in my feeds, heh.
@devloop I think Taibbi and Dore are more from the ex-Tankie wing. But I agree on Brett Weinstein. I think his brother was always a right wing libertarian.
@mattsheffield Bret Stephens at NYT; Marc Thiessen, Megan McArdle, Gary Abernathy and Henry Olsen at the WaPo.
@spike Those are good additions. Any particular thoughts about them?
@mattsheffield I wouldn't piss on any of them if they were on fire
@mattsheffield @spike I must have written several dozen LTEs to the Philly Inquirer admonishing them for wasting precious space on Thiessen's disingenuousness (with several or more published over the years) as part of our PA Dean/Democracy for America Rapid Response Team that operated for many years. I really can't remember a single piece of his that isn't just full of sh*t.

@mattsheffield
One of the clearest examples hereof which I've seen of late is with the pundits in the New York Times and even WaPo - your Jonathans Chait, your Pamelas Paul, your Dowds and Brooks and whathaveyou.

Casting themselves as centrist or even liberal, their written words nonetheless handwave, excuse or both-side the abuses and extremism so thoroughly displayed by the Republican party -- and of the billionaires they serve. It's hard to think of them as anything but disingenuous.

@theogrin I think several of those people you name are actually conservative and always have been. But because what calls itself "conservatism" in the US is repellent reactionaryism that many people do not realize they are on the right.

I'm not sure that Chait fits that diagnosis, but I think the others do. And Brooks has been smart and honest enough to admit that he is conservative.

@mattsheffield Tim Pool and Jimmy Dore too.
@robinbrenizer I think both of them are former liberals who saw they could get rich by pandering to the right. So it's a very similar niche but not quite what I'm talking about, if that makes any sense.
@mattsheffield I mean, pretty much the NYT Opinion squadron as a group.
@ronhogan Ah yikes. I don't know all of them but certainly a lot of them seem to be that way. Do you think this group knows that it is conservative or does it see itself as "centrist?"

@mattsheffield Brooks, at least, knows he’s conservative, and I think Douthat probably would as well if you forced him to put a label on it, along with a few others. French certainly wouldn’t deny it.

There ARE some genuine progressives in the mix, of course, but I personally suspect the majority have convinced themselves their neoliberalism is really a sterling example of “independent thinking.”

@ronhogan Definitely Brooks and Douthat would describe as conservative.

Among the neoliberals, I think they probably would not even realize that they are neoliberals and that globally, neoliberalism is regarded as a conservative ideology.

@mattsheffield I get so frustrated with the 'You only know what the MSM tells you crowd'... Guys like Rogan are getting the same kind of advertising dollars as 'the MSM' but have even less accountability and aren't really doing any investigative research. They're just snake suppliment salesmen.
@obscurestar It is very frustrating. They in many cases have far larger audiences than a typical CNN or MSNBC host but pretend that they are not corporate media or are somehow above ideological systems.

@mattsheffield

We see the same things after the threat of RRR sadopopulism failed despite three weak to ass-whoopin' level elections for them.

Threats? Realization that going in on this means killing a party? Money men who own the newsmedia dont want their taxes raised?

@SatelliteOfLove I don't know the "RRR" acronym. What is it?

@mattsheffield

a RRR government in DC

back then it was more understandable, but after 18, 20, and 22, its a bad horse to bet on unless ??? is in play

@SatelliteOfLove I mean I don't know what you mean by "RRR"

@mattsheffield

R in the white house
R led senate
R led house

@SatelliteOfLove An ok. Usually people call that a "trifecta." But I see what you mean.

@mattsheffield

Ive seen "hat trick" too

maybe its regional

@mattsheffield Jimmy Dore and Dave Rubin are in that "I didn't leave the Democrat Party. The Democrat Party left me." grift
@numbakrunch Yes that is a grift, but I think it's a bit different from this group I'm talking about who at least acknowledge they are Republican supporters while Dore certainly will not be so honest.