One thing that never really gets said but everyone knows is true is that one of the reasons transphobes are so focused on preventing trans teens from stopping their bodies' natural puberties is that it scares them if they can't immediate "tell" if a person is trans.

They push to delay transition because it results in trans people looking more "visibly trans," which is what the transphobes want.

They see someone like Kim Petras, someone they'd have no clue was trans if they weren't told, and they get really weird. They want to be able to "mark" us as trans, so they push to make it harder and harder to transition, pushing into the 20s to ensure that we're visibly trans enough for them.
It's why places like NYT will be like, "omg, this person who detransitioned after going on testosterone for a year has a raspier voice than most women now and she has a bit of facial hair! Omg!" Not realizing/caring that forcing trans girls, for instance, to go through a testosterone-driven puberty DOES THE SAME THING. Equally bad, yet they don't see this as a cost.

It's why the theme of "omg, you hooked up with a duuuuuuuuuuddddeeeee?!?!" stuff in movies (The Crying Game, Ace Ventura, etc.) was so popular for so long: it reflects a real anxiety about being "tricked."

And so certain portions of society take it upon themselves to make sure trans people are as visibly trans as possible: they feel entitled to know if someone is trans.

It's all based on really gross transphobic tropes.

A lot of people genuinely seem to think they have some sort of right to know if their coworkers or acquaintances are trans. That's absurd. They don't. It's a wild invasion of privacy.

So they push for policies that make it easier to clock us. It's a big old sexist attack.

@parkermolloy
Reductive as the point may be, I like to equate it to the birthmark question.

Would you randomly ask someone if they have a birthmark? Where it is? How big, what shape, the extent to which it affects their lives?

Would you disrobe a person, sometimes forcibly, to determine if they have such a birthmark? Would you scream at them for hiding a birthmark? Would you demand they wear patches on their clothes stating they have one?

It's not that different.

@theogrin @parkermolloy or would you randomly ask a cis person if their genitals are intact? do they have both of their testicles? do they have their breasts and uterus? the answer in nearly every case not involving the person's medical team is that it's none of their business
@matunos @theogrin @parkermolloy I'd go further and say that cis men don't want to know the state of a cis woman's organs; they pale and retreat if hysterectomy, physical changes from pregnancy, etc. are mentioned, much less details shared.

@JosetAEtzel @matunos @parkermolloy

The very question of a period! Even for non-menstruating folks, it's like, hey, dude? If you're going to regale us with the details of the rash you oh-so-mysteriously obtained the other night, don't pule when we tell you that it feels like our abdomens are trying to turn inside out.