He continues, "This kind of extravagant, climate-damaging pollution is unnecessary, unjust, and we are calling for an end to it."
@ScientistRebellion
I am 100 % with you supporting bans of private jets.
But not because the emissions are so large in absolute numbers (they pollute a lot compared to human humans, and it is so ridiculously unnecessary) but because private jets are a wonderful symbol of inequal distribution of wealth AND environmental destruction. Although ridiculous, the largest emissions are not caused so much by the lifestyle of these sad and hollow persons, but by their investments.
I see 4 options
1) Business as usual: governments and corporations continue to lead us on the path of destruction, selling the wellbeing of billions and our ecosystems literally for a handful of dollars.
2) rich people notice (with a little help from activists) that they have to put there money into more sustainable imvestments.
3) investments and financial markets get strongly regulated (governments get helped by activists), investments become more sustainable.
4) wealth is distributed and we achieve a wellbeing economy.
Option 4 is the most coherent one, but I wouldn't be too unhappy with a (quick!) transition including at least initially option 2 and 3.
@ScientistRebellion There are some surprising names on the list of people who are even worse. It's all obscene.