Sebastiaan MathôtEven with open data, open materials, and good intent, it's hard to reproduce results from psychological studies! In part that's just the nature of the game, I suppose: reproducible analyses require a level of skill that few psychologists have (although the number is growing). https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221140828 1/2
I also can't help a cynical related thought when reading these articles: societies like the APS (who own Psych Sci), Psychonomic Society are all about scientific reform when it costs them nothing: open data, diversity, etc. But they're not even considering making their journals #openaccess, which is one of the main pillars of #openscience, and the only one that would hurt their financial interests! Credits to the @ESCOP 🤛 as one of the few (only?) psychological societies that has put its members before its finances and launched an open-access journal for the community!(Journal of Cognition). 2/2
Adrian Gadient-Brügger@sebastiaan
Check out #psychOpen, a publisher with exclusively #OpenAccess #psychology journals: https://www.psychopen.eu
Even free for authors, no fees.
Journals also tend to have progressive #OpenScience policies
@adriangadientbruegger Thank you! I didn't know about this, but it seems pretty legit. (I know the ZPID from other things too.)