BIG NEWS: #TyreNichols’ murder reminds us that #police traffic stops can turn deadly. 400 unarmed drivers killed in 5 years.

I'm introducing the "Safer Traffic Stops Act". It would pay local governments to transfer traffic enforcement from armed police officers to cameras or civilians.

@RitchieTorres That won't help, because armed drug dealers will still be found by civilians - and may still turn deadly.

@alpha1beta But why would armed drug dealers kill anyone over a traffic ticket?

The reason traffic stops turn deadly is because we use them as a pretext for cops to catch more serious criminals. But if it was just a ticket and not a warrant check, roadside search, and other investigations; nobody would care.

As usual, the solutions we’ve been doing cause the biggest problems we face; including how The War on Drugs makes every problem associated with drugs far worse.

@biobrain Because folks who are armed and dangerous and they're forced to ID themselves.

For anyone with anything illegal it'll set off fight/flight.

And to any decent cop, you're going to look much closer if they have a record.

These folks are criminal masterminds, they're drugs are typically in plain sight. The second they see flashing lights they know they're going to ail, and they have seconds to decide what to do

@alpha1beta Everything you're describing is caused by the current system and the scenario you gave would get an armed cop killed the same as a civilian since guns can't stop bullets.

Imagine if criminals knew that cops wouldn't check their record or arrest them even if drugs were in plain site? Why would they risk life in prison or execution over a $100 speeding ticket or expired tags?

Again, our solutions are causing the biggest problems; including the War on Drugs itself.

@biobrain You're also making the assumption that its just minor little tickets and not reckless driving or actions that critically endanger people's lives or that a cop doesn't pull someone over because they see something while they're say returning from another call. What are they supposed to do, call a civilian while a drunk driver continues on?

I get your point. One of my favorite cities in the world (Ithaca, NY) has been trying to do something similar. But it's not that simple.

@biobrain This article has a write up on how Ithaca is proposing to divide duties, missing one that I know was previously mentioned - car accidents would be civilian + EMS as needed. Traffic generally could be handled by both.

https://ithacavoice.com/2022/03/city-introduces-long-awaited-plans-for-department-of-community-safety-in-sweeping-recommendations-report/

City introduces long-awaited plans for Department of Community Safety in sweeping recommendations report

Ithaca Voice reporter Jimmy Jordan contributed reporting to this article. ITHACA, N.Y.—More than a year after the Reimagining Public Safety process was jumpstarted with much fanfare, the city can finally lay its eyes on concrete ideas for the future of policing in Ithaca. The City of Ithaca published its final recommendations report on implementing the […]

The Ithaca Voice
@alpha1beta That sounds good. So why are you opposing such a system on a national level?

@biobrain I'm not generally opposed to it, but there's no way to implement it without causing more harm in the short term.

This plan wouldn't meet your needs, really, cops are still going to be the primary for traffic - their only planning to hire 5 civilians. Honestly, you'd probably be better off telling the cops to put their gun in the trunk instead of their belt.

@alpha1beta All the harm is caused by our current system. We're not only putting civilians at risk of being shot by cops but cops are more at risk too.

And this bill would give national funding for plans like Ithaca's. It's not banning armed traffic stops, but funding civilian traffic cops. And if details need to be worked out, they can.

@biobrain funding = incentives. It doesn't do anything to mandate it. So you end up in a patchwork system that, like in NJ, could have a different response every half a mile of highway. That doesn't work - drug dealers, among other lowlife criminals, aren't smart enough to say oh, this guy's only a civilian let's not run or shoot them.

When I've been pulled over, I haven't always known what agency is doing it and I generally know where I am and am never on drugs or any sort.

@alpha1beta Yes, you're right. Some criminals panic and wouldn't know if a cop is armed or unarmed. An armed cop would die the same as an unarmed cop.

Why do you keep repeating this nonsense? Having a gun doesn't protect cops from being shot by someone ready to kill them. That's why they shoot people they even THINK have a gun.

@biobrain Most won't just shoot someone though, they speed off, they run away but then cops have to go after them. And the ones who are gonna shoot are most likely going to shoot right away, before you can ID them or get anything more than a plate - that's their best way to survive. Even then, most places call in a plate before they're pulled over, soon as they do, a cop with a gun is gonna be called in if they have warrants, stolen car etc.

@alpha1beta You're right. Most criminals will run away due to our current system and cops will risk their lives and the lives of civilians trying to stop them for the original crime of speeding or expired tags. And if they shoot, they'll shoot immediately and the cop will die whether or not they're armed.

And cops use traffic stops as a pretext to find other crimes, which makes criminals more likely to be scared.

Why do you keep proving my point? Our current system is the problem.

@biobrain Every system is broken. Yours would let criminal scum run around unstopped. You'll see more drug trafficking, gun running, DUI etc because who's gonna stop me.

You're saying a new system will be better, without considering any new risk, and prioritizing the lives of criminals over the innocent.

Are there improvements that can be made? Sure. Locking drug dealers up for life would arguable be a better one - less on the street, higher risk of becoming one.

@biobrain So your point, while well intended, is based on some alternative reality, without being tested. It's mental masturbation. It's not real.

You think Texas would ever, ever do this? No way.

Every system is a problem. Anyone who says otherwise is ignorant. And any new system will be a problem too. If we wanted to improve things, we should look at root causes - why do people deal drugs? For most, its probably the best economic activity for them.

@biobrain Raise the minimum wage, guarantee at least some basic levels of healthcare, provide more opportunity, do everything you can do ban guns or make them as hard to use as possible (fingerprint ID maybe). You'll end up with less people causing a problem for the system - any system.

@alpha1beta No, my system prioritizes the safety of cops and civilians who are being put at risk as we harass millions of citizens hoping to stumble upon serious crimes. And cops could focus on REAL crimes, not traffic stops.

And there would be no drug trafficking if we legalized drugs nationally. Even in states where it's legal they need lots of stupid regulations because it's not legal everywhere.

Please, stop for a moment and think about this. I'm not going to keep doing this.

@biobrain More cops dies of their own stupidity from COVID than anything else. You're saying let the criminals run free to save...checks notes...60 police gun deaths total in 2022...and there's 11,654 alcohol related traffic deaths in 2020 - and ~1000 deaths by cops in any circumstances at all.

You're right, let's do not this anymore, your living in a pipe dream and you want society to bend to your will because you want to do drugs and face no consequences.