A shift to nutritious plant-based diets in high-income nations alone would reduce less-necessary production and land use, cutting dietary emissions by 61% and sequestering 98.3 Gt CO2eq, equal to 14 years of current global agricultural emissions. https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-021-00431-5
Dietary change in high-income nations alone can lead to substantial double climate dividend | Nature Food

A dietary shift from animal-based foods to plant-based foods in high-income nations could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from direct agricultural production and increase carbon sequestration if resulting spared land was restored to its antecedent natural vegetation. We estimate this double effect by simulating the adoption of the EAT–Lancet planetary health diet by 54 high-income nations representing 68% of global gross domestic product and 17% of population. Our results show that such dietary change could reduce annual agricultural production emissions of high-income nations’ diets by 61% while sequestering as much as 98.3 (55.6–143.7) GtCO2 equivalent, equal to approximately 14 years of current global agricultural emissions until natural vegetation matures. This amount could potentially fulfil high-income nations’ future sum of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) obligations under the principle of equal per capita CDR responsibilities. Linking land, food, climate and public health policy will be vital to harnessing the opportunities of a double climate dividend. The exact contribution of alternative diets to climate change mitigation depends on several factors, including where these diets are adopted. This study quantifies avoided greenhouse gas emissions that would result from a shift to EAT–Lancet diets in 54 high-income countries through agricultural production and the restoration of natural vegetation in saved lands.

Fake Meat Was Supposed to Save the World. It Became Just Another Fad

Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods wanted to upend the world’s $1 trillion meat industry. But plant-based meat is turning out to be a flop.

Bloomberg
@jasonhickel @kunev Is it just me, or are Bloomberg too giddy about how our culture just can't seem to let go of its "real meat" obsession so alternatives are failing...?

@muiiio weeeell… “Hipster tree huggers try a new way to save the planet without causing too many people too much of a mild inconvenience, but ultimately fail because of people’s strong love for TRADITIONAL VALUES” is a far better story than “Innovation trying to solve ecological problems by working within a market economy gets fucked because the meat industry of today is hardly if at all distinguishable from the tobacco one of a few decades ago”.

@jasonhickel

@kunev Interestingly, they never ran such an ad attacking, say, cigarette smoke... How very curious! @jasonhickel

@jasonhickel

That's a lot of a change in emissions for such small daily action of not eating meat. But then, the people in the rich countries need to act. It is their responsibility, after all, but I wonder for how long their habits will remain unchallenged

@jasonhickel It won’t happen. Vegetarian restaurants always fail where I live and there are tons of vegans and vegetarians. The mindset is going meatless is the same as being deprived.

Meat’s an expensive dish to serve in a meal. The economics of being a vegetarian is that if you’re not purchasing meats, then you can suddenly afford the very best of everything else.

@jasonhickel
Stopping to burn fossil fuels would reduce greenhouse gas emissions by well over two thirds so that is the first thing everyone needs to do as fast as they possibly can.
@jasonhickel Been vegan since 1996 and I honestly thought that by the year 2023 most of the planet would have seen the writing on the ecological wall and followed suit. But, no, apparently we have to continue having our meat quarter pounders and damn the consequences.
We're not even doing the *easy* stuff at this point. Going vegan is low hanging fruit
@Shivviness @jasonhickel Going back a hundred years and a bit, most people in the western world were not having meat every day. Scaling back to meat once a week would help a lot and might be more palatable to a lot of people (pun intended). The meat mafia wouldn’t like it, though, so it’ll be uphill both ways either way.