In light of the latest paper confirming that agricultural intensification accelerates rather than mitigates #deforestation (Jevon's), here's an oft-forgotten paper from 2002 that does an amazing job exploring proximate and underlying causes. #food #agriculture

"Public and individual decisions largely respond to changing, national- to global-scale economic opportunities and/or policies, mediated by local-scale institutional factors ... prevail in causing deforestation."

https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/52/2/143/341135

Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation: Tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations

One of the primary causes of global environmental change is tropical deforestation, but the question of what factors drive deforestation remains largely unanswe

OUP Academic
@ConserveChange
Oh, what is this latest paper? I can point to quite a number of those, note that it's also wrong to say that the literature "confirms" that #intensification accelerates #deforestation. Processes, contexts, types of intensification matter, both outcomes exist (not elaborating here but of course the answer is not "its complicated", we can and do have a good sense of what leads to what:
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8b14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006
& many others
@pmeyfroidt I was referring to this paper. I said "confirm" because many have been arguing that stopping land use conversion wont just magically happen as agriculture gets more efficient, and that the reverse may be true (i.e., Jevons Paradox). This paper speaks directly to that argument with data https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-022-02540-4
Sparing or expanding? The effects of agricultural yields on farm expansion and deforestation in the tropics - Biodiversity and Conservation

Land Sparing predicts that agricultural intensification is the best way to meet productive, humanitarian and conservation goals, and the recent prominence of this strategy on conservation and agricultural agendas is notable. The basic idea is that, by producing more, agriculture intensification can spare natural habitats from further agriculture expansion. Nevertheless, some authors have suggested that intensifying and increasing productivity may actually lead to increasing expansion of agricultural lands (Jevons Paradox). We test the association between agricultural yield on farmland expansion and on deforestation between 2000 and 2015 in 122 nations along the tropics, and in the main tropical regions. To this end we used Generalized Linear Models, as well as Panel Data to verify the effects of agricultural yield and socioeconomic variables on farmland expansion and deforestation. Greater yield increases lead to higher deforestation rates in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and Caribbean and increasing yield average induces agriculture expansion in East Asia and Pacific, giving support to the Jevons Paradox hypothesis. On the other hand, we found a positive association between yield average and forest area change in the tropics, nevertheless, regression coefficients were very small, compared to other significant models. Therefore, Jevons Paradox seems to be more common than Land Sparing and increasing yields inducing deforestation rather than curbing it.

SpringerLink
@pmeyfroidt And thanks for sharing those two links! I had the middle range theory paper but not the other one!
@ConserveChange Thanks, will read*!
Sure, there's still many papers out there that assume that land sparing will magically happen or is subordinate to intensification (like that one: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00968-8 ) (while it can quite be the contrary, i.e. expansion control contributes to inducing intensification https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay110 )
@ConserveChange
* Though honestly, given the very hard time we had for fixing the statistics in that study by Virginia Rodriguez-GarcĂ­a cited above, I am a bit concerned about plain regressions in a system where variables are so strongly mutually influencing each other (productivity and area typically have mutual causations over time)
@ConserveChange @pmeyfroidt My experience in Indonesia with oil palm is that many studies do not take into account the way per hectare yields may be average or poor, but it's the post-processing conversion rate that determines if more capital will be attracted to CPO, and thereby accelerate deforestation. The palm oil business model of nucleus/plasma estate, with monopsony power, depresses smallholder income almost regardless of how productive they are per hectare. However, this flips when more processing mills open: smallholders have better terms of trade, returns to efficiency increase...drawing in more smallholders to push the forest boundary! So relationship between efficiency and deforestation is driven differently by mill owners than by smallholders. But of course, the former are far more destructive than the latter, due to local political power.
[Sorry for the long post!]
@dommiz @ConserveChange
Thanks, definitely the kind of in-depth knowledge that is crucial to design proper policies