In light of the latest paper confirming that agricultural intensification accelerates rather than mitigates #deforestation (Jevon's), here's an oft-forgotten paper from 2002 that does an amazing job exploring proximate and underlying causes. #food #agriculture

"Public and individual decisions largely respond to changing, national- to global-scale economic opportunities and/or policies, mediated by local-scale institutional factors ... prevail in causing deforestation."

https://academic.oup.com/bioscience/article/52/2/143/341135

Proximate Causes and Underlying Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation: Tropical forests are disappearing as the result of many pressures, both local and regional, acting in various combinations in different geographical locations

One of the primary causes of global environmental change is tropical deforestation, but the question of what factors drive deforestation remains largely unanswe

OUP Academic
@ConserveChange
Oh, what is this latest paper? I can point to quite a number of those, note that it's also wrong to say that the literature "confirms" that #intensification accelerates #deforestation. Processes, contexts, types of intensification matter, both outcomes exist (not elaborating here but of course the answer is not "its complicated", we can and do have a good sense of what leads to what:
https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8b14
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.08.006
& many others
@pmeyfroidt I was referring to this paper. I said "confirm" because many have been arguing that stopping land use conversion wont just magically happen as agriculture gets more efficient, and that the reverse may be true (i.e., Jevons Paradox). This paper speaks directly to that argument with data https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10531-022-02540-4
Sparing or expanding? The effects of agricultural yields on farm expansion and deforestation in the tropics - Biodiversity and Conservation

Land Sparing predicts that agricultural intensification is the best way to meet productive, humanitarian and conservation goals, and the recent prominence of this strategy on conservation and agricultural agendas is notable. The basic idea is that, by producing more, agriculture intensification can spare natural habitats from further agriculture expansion. Nevertheless, some authors have suggested that intensifying and increasing productivity may actually lead to increasing expansion of agricultural lands (Jevons Paradox). We test the association between agricultural yield on farmland expansion and on deforestation between 2000 and 2015 in 122 nations along the tropics, and in the main tropical regions. To this end we used Generalized Linear Models, as well as Panel Data to verify the effects of agricultural yield and socioeconomic variables on farmland expansion and deforestation. Greater yield increases lead to higher deforestation rates in Sub-Saharan Africa and Latin America and Caribbean and increasing yield average induces agriculture expansion in East Asia and Pacific, giving support to the Jevons Paradox hypothesis. On the other hand, we found a positive association between yield average and forest area change in the tropics, nevertheless, regression coefficients were very small, compared to other significant models. Therefore, Jevons Paradox seems to be more common than Land Sparing and increasing yields inducing deforestation rather than curbing it.

SpringerLink
@ConserveChange Thanks, will read*!
Sure, there's still many papers out there that assume that land sparing will magically happen or is subordinate to intensification (like that one: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-022-00968-8 ) (while it can quite be the contrary, i.e. expansion control contributes to inducing intensification https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aay110 )
@ConserveChange
* Though honestly, given the very hard time we had for fixing the statistics in that study by Virginia Rodriguez-GarcĂ­a cited above, I am a bit concerned about plain regressions in a system where variables are so strongly mutually influencing each other (productivity and area typically have mutual causations over time)