I would amend that to say that it's wrong to beat any person to death regardless of presumed guilt or innocence.
I perceived a mob mentality across those officers.
@anildash
I think this is a better way to frame it than 'we know they know it's wrong because they don't do it to everyone.'
They think it's *right*. The reason they don't do it to just anyone is because they can't get away with it - they would, if they could.
Remove all sadistic cops.
bingo. too often becoming a policeman is the easiest job to get for someone wanting out of food service. Give me a gun and handcuffs and a taser?? Hell yes! There should be a psych eval for anyone who wants to be a policeman. People who are at the end of the spectrum as far as intelligence goes should not be allowed to join. Look to other nations for comparison. We should air higher. Protestors would get along better with police who arrest them for illegal things, as an example, if they aren't beating them with batons and tasering them. argh!
@Guillotine @BillMcGuire @anildash
That's the damn truth.
@JenWojcik @Guillotine @anildash
I remember spending Thanksgiving up in east TX with my grandparents on mom's side. Grandma told us that the paper bag by the toilet was for poop paper. Their septic tank was full. As a teen, I was scarred by that. hahaha
interesting theory, but I was a lowly waiter's asst who washed dishes, etc., at a gourmet restaurant for a bit. To me it was just a part time job while in college. I didn't make a life of it like some might be stuck in. I believe it is far different having food service job long term than one that is temporary as mine was. I'm a firm believer in being nice to food servers and anyone else who has the opportunity to spit in my food, which is why I am quick to tell anyone at my table not to speak unkindly to the staff. carry on
@anildash To add to this correct statement, IMO, it starts because police culture *first* teaches that it's *right* to beat someone to death. That lesson is taught implicitly, and no one explicitly tries to counter it, for the reason you mention: We (society) assume it's not something we need to teach a putatively sane adult.
So Joe Cop joins up, and he learns from his fellow officers you gotta be tough to deal with the scum, it's kill or be killed, and no one's gonna care if you rough some guy up, thin blue line, means justify the ends, and there's no effort spent training recruits against that culture.
/1
@anildash /2
Suppose that instead of training starting with "Here's how you take down a man with a gun", it started with "Here's how you *talk* down a man with a gun." If de-escalation, conflict avoidance, and respect for human rights was the primary focus, and the use of force was taught as a failure mode, a sign maybe you're not cut out for being a cop, maybe, just maybe, there'd be a cultural shift.
But doing that is only possible if the existing personnel weren't already in place to undermine it. Cultural change is *hard*, in any institution, and there's few institutions that can just dissolve and re-form. Not only is the preservation of institutional knowledge essential, such 're-formed' groups typically attract the same people.
@anildash this goes back a long, long way. Police have been used as race and class enforcement pretty much as long as there have been police. But in more recent history, there was a major turning point when former US President George W Bush militarized the police.
A lot of us said at the time, "the military is for killing enemies. Police are not here to kill enemies. They're here to protect citizens."
But that kind of messaging and empowerment has absolutely done its job, and it's hard to find a cop who doesn't see the world as a battle between good guys and bad guys, and the bad guys are civilians.