show 🌹
Carsten Roeger@baddadda @philosophy If this question makes sense, philosophy does too.
MizmarAs mostly disciplines are reflexive, that's true for everything; physics, theology...
@baddadda @philosophy @Mizmar How is physics reflexive? What is the nature of natural science is a philosophical question.
Morten Bay@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy @Mizmar I think the question was misunderstood.
Q: Which philosophy makes sense?
A: Several philosophies in the constructionist tradition argue that sense, meaning, truth, and/or logic is made/produced rather than discovered as an objective phenomenon existing independent of human perception.
You're welcome 🤣
Good. I seem to have understood and got the right answer - analytic.
What do I win?
@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy
Hopkins Stanley@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy @Mizmar
Totally agree. In a certain sense, Philosophy is the ultimate defrauding of Nature, making it a product of Rationality’s edifice. After all, in the Lacanian sense, you have to put a rabbit in the hat before you can pull one out of it…🤭
1. Certainly physicists reflect on their discipline - as do biologists, theologians, historiens etc. I'm currently learning ethnomusicology and you can't pick up a classic text that doesn't leave philosophy in the dust for in it's self analysis
2. That philosophy habitually turns round and claims "job demarcation!" is entirely philosophies problem. Philosophers who do that should spend more time reflecting in their own disciple!
@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy
Of course it does; that’s what I meant with Saying, in a certain sense, Philosophy is the ultimate defrauding of Nature. It en-structures what we call “the natural world” as something we’re not part of, so we can control/dominate it in fairly predictable ways - making it a reflexion of our creation.
You remember me i still own you a clear protest on your statement 🧐
Of course I do - 😊 How could I ever forget you Mi Amigo?