show 🌹
Schlüssellochkind 👁️@baddadda The sober one 😁 @philosophy
😆
Wondering since so many years already.
Never dared to ask it soberly.
So i thought, why not ask today.
Serious question.
One of my most serious ones.
Hopkins StanleyYou be asking me? I just stumbled into de.group and cluelessly used it…🤫
Easy. As long as it’s in copy list, it will boost.
(much more friendly and correct than the last one surprising me)
I wasn’t being unfriendly, just establishing I’m not very literate in the workings of Masto…
But if you want to talk about the Philosophy of the Machine…tee hee!
Ja, I live in San Francisco. I’m ashamed to Say, I wasn’t aware of the asteroid until you asked…then I asked the husband who gave me the details. 😒
you are a real marketing guy
fighting for the product
even in some disaster
Sorry, i’m making a little fun of heideana, this Don Quichotte de la filosofia.
This is a wonder of philosophy.
As soon as you follow it mentally,
it sticks to you.
Run run run!
Carsten Roeger@baddadda @philosophy If this question makes sense, philosophy does too.
MizmarAs mostly disciplines are reflexive, that's true for everything; physics, theology...
@baddadda @philosophy @Mizmar How is physics reflexive? What is the nature of natural science is a philosophical question.
Morten Bay@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy @Mizmar I think the question was misunderstood.
Q: Which philosophy makes sense?
A: Several philosophies in the constructionist tradition argue that sense, meaning, truth, and/or logic is made/produced rather than discovered as an objective phenomenon existing independent of human perception.
You're welcome 🤣
Good. I seem to have understood and got the right answer - analytic.
What do I win?
@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy
@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy @Mizmar
Totally agree. In a certain sense, Philosophy is the ultimate defrauding of Nature, making it a product of Rationality’s edifice. After all, in the Lacanian sense, you have to put a rabbit in the hat before you can pull one out of it…🤭
1. Certainly physicists reflect on their discipline - as do biologists, theologians, historiens etc. I'm currently learning ethnomusicology and you can't pick up a classic text that doesn't leave philosophy in the dust for in it's self analysis
2. That philosophy habitually turns round and claims "job demarcation!" is entirely philosophies problem. Philosophers who do that should spend more time reflecting in their own disciple!
@CarstenRoeger @baddadda @philosophy
Of course it does; that’s what I meant with Saying, in a certain sense, Philosophy is the ultimate defrauding of Nature. It en-structures what we call “the natural world” as something we’re not part of, so we can control/dominate it in fairly predictable ways - making it a reflexion of our creation.
You remember me i still own you a clear protest on your statement 🧐
Of course I do - 😊 How could I ever forget you Mi Amigo?
Analytic philosophy probably has the best track record of identifying questions which make no sense. That makes sense.
😁 👍
Note there are several meanings in this question. Not just paradox ones.
One is: “Does is make sense to philosophise?”
Hermit Philosopher@baddadda @philosophy I’d have to first ask which “philosophy” and what sort of “sense” we’d be speaking of.
Exactly. There are several meanings/interpretations hidden in this question.
i was indeed not only playing with a paradox but also with meanings and looking for the interpretations in the answers 😇
kuldip suri@baddadda @philosophy
I am stuck with #SriAurobindo 's Integral Yoga and Arthur Scheoanheaur Ideas...
I am stuck with #SriAurobindo 's Integral Yoga and Arthur Scheoanheaur Ideas...