Being an omnivorous technology generalist is punishing to start out as and lasts for years, but becomes incredibly valuable later. That's something I wish I could have told the prior me.
Come to understand: Being a generalist is not about "lacking experience to call yourself an expert." Touching on innumerable disciplines is itself a crucial skill that lets you operate in the real world with huge autonomy. Just know your limits. Most problems don't need specialists. Generalists are the ones that ***know when to call in the specialists and give them what they need***.

@SwiftOnSecurity I wish the corporate world would have understood that. I kept being pushed toward specializing, saying they have no use for a "general purpose IT guy".

Yet i was always the one who figured those "impossible to fix" bugs because i understood all parts of the system, and how they interact.

Specialists only test their very specific bit of the setup.

But nope, no path forward for that, no possible raises, and "we can outsource that part to IT service partners".

@Pyxaron This is something, we as an IT Security department, are pushing. You need to employ cross-functional IT generalists. Just working on stuff that needs them, not assigned to a project. They are the ones we can talk to about getting things done in a larger vision. Who can unclog absolutely nonsensical blockers with their larger contextual knowledge.
@SwiftOnSecurity I'm trying to hire a mid-tier generalist - basically because we need an extra tier between 1st line and me so I can focus on more complex consultancy work - and it's really hard. People seem to get piped into the specialism sausage factory really early in their career now.
@interpipes @SwiftOnSecurity As a fellow generalist, the usual screening questions about "are you expert in this or that" is always disappointing. You don't want to hire me for what I'm expert in, you want to hire me because of all the things I've learned, mastered, deployed, and forgotten, and what I can learn and learn and master and deploy tomorrow. I've been hired because I was an expert in technology-X several times, only for that narrow skill being almost irrelevant within 3 months.

@jab01701mid @SwiftOnSecurity THIS

I do not have any interest in experts in whatever the latest fad is. You need people who understand concepts and can apply them to whatever today's trendy thing is.

@interpipes @SwiftOnSecurity

what kinda generalist?

@dustinfinn @SwiftOnSecurity the replies to this toot cover the gist of it, not that I expect any one candidate to know everything on this list on day one, cos.. that’s my job https://infosec.exchange/@SwiftOnSecurity/109753213550941295
SwiftOnSecurity (@[email protected])

@[email protected] I boosted your reply, respond with job reqs if you want and place to apply

Infosec Exchange
@SwiftOnSecurity @Pyxaron
I love this. It's a complete role description.
@SwiftOnSecurity @Pyxaron this is so true. I consider myself a generalist, and my resume is all over the place. But my widely varied experience means I'm usually the one who can solve the weird problems, or at least point others in a new direction to get it solved.
@SwiftOnSecurity @Pyxaron "SafeHands" is a lot more complimentary than "Generalist".
@SwiftOnSecurity @Pyxaron wait, you can do IT-Security as a non-generalist? I thought we’re all more diversely focused than your average Dev?
@SwiftOnSecurity @Pyxaron On the project where I’m working now there are different teams working on different parts of the Big System but we, the cybersecurity team, need to have a general knowledge between us about how the whole Big System works and its various components and design patterns (even though the term “design patterns” is not used in the project, they definitely exist), especially to do threat modeling.
@SwiftOnSecurity @Pyxaron Just thinking about what a handful of at-large IT generalists could do at my org if they had sufficient permission, flexibility, and nobody to report to for formal projects or upkeep of existing stuff. I think it would be amazing.